Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830902›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

The gradient of the reinforcement landscape influences sensorimotor learning.

Joshua G A Cashaback, Christopher K Lao, Dimitrios J Palidis, Susan K Coltman, Heather R McGregor, Paul L Gribble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reinforcement feedback impairs locomotor adaptation and retention.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Implicit reward-based motor learning.Experimental brain research · 2023
    Article
  16. Implicit reward-based motor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neuromuscular control: from a biomechanist's perspective.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua G A CashabackHuman Performance Laboratory, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8642-6648
Christopher K LaoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Dimitrios J PalidisGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Susan K ColtmanGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3113-0911
Heather R McGregorGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paul L GribbleDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-032X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consideration of previous successes and failures is essential to mastering a motor skill. Much of what we know about how humans and animals learn from such reinforcement feedback comes from experiments that involve sampling from a small number of discrete actions. Yet, it is less understood how we learn through reinforcement feedback when sampling from a continuous set of possible actions. Navigating a continuous set of possible actions likely requires using gradient information to maximize success. Here we addressed how humans adapt the aim of their hand when experiencing reinforcement feedback that was associated with a continuous set of possible actions. Specifically, we manipulated the change in the probability of reward given a change in motor action-the reinforcement gradient-to study its influence on learning. We found that participants learned faster when exposed to a steep gradient compared to a shallow gradient. Further, when initially positioned between a steep and a shallow gradient that rose in opposite directions, participants were more likely to ascend the steep gradient. We introduce a model that captures our results and several features of motor learning. Taken together, our work suggests that the sensorimotor system relies on temporally recent and spatially local gradient information to drive learning.

Indexed as

LearningMotor SkillsReinforcement, PsychologyHandHumansProbabilityTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30830902
PMCPMC6417747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.