ArticleCEN case reports2019
Successful treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis caused by Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis.
Article in CEN case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Description and Analysis of the Complete Genome ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Draft Genome Sequence of Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis TSA37, Isolated from Wood Ash.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 53-year-old man receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) for 4 months presented with PD-related peritonitis (abdominal pain, turbid peritoneal dialysate effluent, white blood cell in peritoneal dialysate effluent 5350/µL, C-reactive protein 25.56 mg/dL) caused by Dermacoccus (D.) nishinomiyaensis. He was first treated empirically with cefazolin and ceftazidime. After detection of D. nishinomiyaensis in the peritoneal effluent culture collected on the first day of hospitalization, the antibiotics were changed to amoxicillin and vancomycin. After confirming negative-conversion of peritoneal effluent culture, treatment was continued for more than 6 weeks. The peritonitis resolved; he continues peritoneal dialysis without withdrawal from PD or catheter removal. D. nishinomiyaensis is part of resident microbiota of the skin, and its pathogenicity is rarely reported. To date, there is no report of PD-related peritonitis caused by D. nishinomiyaensis. Because it is a slow grower, it may be missed and the peritonitis categorized as culture-negative. Long-term culture is important to detect it. It is difficult to determine the antibiotics that can be used because susceptibility to antibiotics is unknown due to the organism's rarity. Furthermore, the appropriate treatment period is also unknown. Long-term treatment may be useful in PD-related peritonitis caused by D. nishinomiyaensis because it is a slow grower.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.