Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830658›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019

Evaluation of kidney biopsies in elderly patients.

Murat Tuğcu, Umut Kasapoğlu, Gülizar Şahin, Süheyla Apaydın, Gülistan Gümrükçü

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Murat TuğcuDepartment of Nephrology, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Cd No: 10, 34899, Istanbul, Turkey. drmrttgc@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5307-050X
Umut KasapoğluDepartment of Nephrology, Agrı Public Hospital, Agrı, Turkey.
Gülizar ŞahinDepartment of Nephrology, Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Süheyla ApaydınDepartment of Nephrology, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gülistan GümrükçüDepartment of Nephrology, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe renal parenchymal disease spectrum in geriatric patients is similar to that in younger patients and can be controlled by appropriate treatment. We evaluated the clinicopathological features of kidney biopsies from geriatric patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred nine native kidney biopsies from older patients (> 65 years old) obtained from 2005 to 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. The specimens were inspected by the same pathologist in the same laboratory by light microscopy and immunofluorescence.

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 7.8 years (range 65-90 years), and 51.3% were female. The most frequent indication for kidney biopsy was proteinuria at the nephrotic level (56.8%). The most frequent histopathological diagnoses were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in primary glomerulonephritis and secondary amyloidosis in secondary glomerulonephritis. The rate of major complications due to kidney biopsy was < 1%.

resultKidney biopsy is an effective and safe method of evaluating renal parenchymal diseases in older patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFemaleHumansKidneyKidney DiseasesMaleRetrospective StudiesComplicationGeriatricGlomerulonephritisKidney biopsy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.