Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830566›Full record

ReviewNeuromolecular medicine2019

Blood Biomarkers for Stroke Diagnosis and Management.

Joseph Kamtchum-Tatuene, Glen C Jickling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuromolecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Injury to repair: Functions of microglia and monocyte-derived cells in ischemic stroke.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2025
    Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph Kamtchum-TatueneNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 4-120 Katz Building, 114 Street & 87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada. kamtchum@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-4202
Glen C JicklingNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 4-120 Katz Building, 114 Street & 87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.

Funding

Genomics of Intracerebral Hemorrhage and its CausesR01NS106950 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ANDER, BRADLEY PEARCE, SHARP, FRANK R · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Whole Genome RNA Sequencing (RNAseq) of Blood from Patients with Lacunar StrokeR01NS101718 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SHARP, FRANK R, STAMOVA, BORYANA · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
Whole Transcriptome Studies of Patients with Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)R01NS097000 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SHARP, FRANK R, STAMOVA, BORYANA · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Biomarker Signatures for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Outcome Following Subarachnoid HemorrhageR61NS119345 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ANDER, BRADLEY PEARCE, SHARP, FRANK R · 2021 to 2023
$2.0M
Biomarker Signatures for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Outcome Following Subarachnoid HemorrhageR33NS119345 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ANDER, BRADLEY PEARCE, SHARP, FRANK R · 2024 to 2025
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097000NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS101718NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106950NINDS NIH HHS R33 NS119345NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS119345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers are objective indicators used to assess normal or pathological processes, evaluate responses to treatment and predict outcomes. Many blood biomarkers already guide decision-making in clinical practice. In stroke, the number of candidate biomarkers is constantly increasing. These biomarkers include proteins, ribonucleic acids, lipids or metabolites. Although biomarkers have the potential to improve the diagnosis and the management of patients with stroke, there is currently no marker that has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity, specificity, rapidity, precision, and cost-effectiveness to be used in the routine management of stroke, thus highlighting the need for additional work. A better standardization of clinical, laboratory and statistical procedures between centers is indispensable to optimize biomarker performance. This review focuses on blood biomarkers that have shown promise for translation into clinical practice and describes some newly reported markers that could add to routine stroke care. Avenues for the discovery of new stroke biomarkers and future research are discussed. The description of the biomarkers is organized according to their expected application in clinical practice: diagnosis, treatment decision, and outcome prediction.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood ProteinsCerebral HemorrhageDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ManagementGlutamic AcidHumansIschemic StrokeLipidsNitric OxidePrognosisRNASecondary PreventionStrokeStroke, LacunarThrombolytic TherapyBiomarkersBlood ProteinsGlutamic AcidLipidsNitric OxideRNABiomarkerDiagnosisGenomicsManagementProteomicsStroke

Identifiers

PMID30830566
PMCPMC6722038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.