Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2019
Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation and its histological effects on the conjunctiva.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Trabeculectomy offers better intraocular pressure reduction in intrapatient comparison to transscleral cyclophotocoagulation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim was to compare the postsurgical outcomes of trabeculectomy (TET) and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) in a similar cohort of eyes diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). MATERIALS AND
methodsFor this monocentric non-randomized retrospective comparative trial, the records of eyes which underwent TET or CPC between 2013 and 2016 at our institution for the treatment of POAG were reviewed. Parameters analyzed before surgery as well as 1 and 2-3 years afterwards were visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), mean defect (MD) of the visual field, number of glaucoma medications and the objective refraction using which the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated.
resultsIn total, 51 eyes of 51 patients underwent TET and 45 eyes of 45 patients underwent CPC. Mean VA dropped in both groups on the last follow-up after surgery (TET-group: 0.17 ± 0.17 to 0.23 ± 0.28 logMAR, p = 0.01/CPC-group: 0.22 ± 0.22 to 0.26 ± 0.27 logMAR, p = 0.01). In the TET- and CPC-groups IOP decreased significantly (TET: 24.9 ± 6.4 to 14.9 ± 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.001/CPC: 23.0 ± 6.5 to 16.0 ± 4.1 mmHg, p = 0.001) although more pronounced and less depending on IOP-lowering medication in eyes after TET. MD remained stable after TET (7.4 ± 4.8 and 8.1 ± 4.9 dB, p = 0.1) but further deteriorated in eyes after CPC (9.0 ± 4.9 and 10.7 ± 4.6 dB, p < 0.001). SIA was comparable in both groups on the last follow-up (TET: 0.83 ± 0.69 D; CPC: 0.91 ± 0.65 D, p = 0.6).
conclusionThe IOP reduction achieved without medication was more pronounced in the TET-group compared with the CPC-group. Visual field remained stable in the TET-group, while further deteriorating in the CPC-group during follow-up. Eyes undergoing CPC had a higher demand for additional medication to reach comparable success rates as TET. Due to this performing TET is favorable over CPC in POAG eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.