Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830541›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2019

Breast-Contour-Preserving Procedure as a Multidisciplinary Parameter of Esthetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Treatment in The Netherlands.

Annnelotte van Bommel, Pauline Spronk, Marc Mureau, Sabine Siesling, Carolien Smorenburg, Rob Tollenaar, Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters, Thijs van Dalen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A clinical perspective on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Annnelotte van BommelDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. a.c.m.van_bommel@lumc.nl.
Pauline SpronkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marc MureauDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carolien SmorenburgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob TollenaarDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marie-Jeanne Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thijs van DalenDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLDutch Institute for Clinical Auditing · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is used as an esthetic outcome parameter, while other treatments contribute also, such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) enabling BCS or immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). This study explores these efforts to preserve the patient's breast contour. PATIENTS AND

methodsAll patients who underwent surgery for invasive breast cancer in The Netherlands between January 2011 and December 2015 were selected from the Dutch national breast cancer audit (n = 61,309). The breast-contour-preserving procedures (BCPP) rate was defined as the rate of primary BCS, BCS after NAC, or mastectomy with IBR. BCPP rates were calculated and compared by year of diagnosis, age categories, and individual hospitals.

resultsThe rate of primary BCS remained stable (53%) while the BCPP rate increased from 63% in 2011 to 71% in 2015 due to an increase in patients receiving BCS after NAC and mastectomy with IBR. Primary BCS rates increased with age (from 17% in patients aged < 30 years to 63% in patients aged 60-69 years), while the proportion of patients undergoing mastectomy with IBR decreased from 44% in patients < 30 years to 1% in patients ≥ 70 years. The BCPP rate was similar for all age groups except for patients > 70 years. BCPP rates varied between the different hospitals in The Netherlands, ranging from 47 to 88%.

conclusionsThe chance of preserving the breast contour for patients with breast cancer has increased substantially over recent years. BCPP provides a comprehensive parameter of esthetic outcome of breast cancer surgery.

Indexed as

EstheticsMammaplastyMastectomy, SegmentalAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID30830541
PMCPMC6510878
OpenAlexW2918558715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.