Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830494›Full record

Trial reportCancer causes & control : CCC2019

Educating Latinas about cervical cancer and HPV: a pilot randomized study.

Beti Thompson, Wendy E Barrington, Katherine J Briant, Erin Kupay, Elizabeth Carosso, Nora E Gonzalez, Virginia J Gonzalez

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beti ThompsonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. bthompso@fhcrc.org.
Wendy E BarringtonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Katherine J BriantFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Erin KupayFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Elizabeth CarossoFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Nora E GonzalezCenter for Community Health Promotion, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 320 N. 16th Street, Sunnyside, WA, 98944, USA.
Virginia J GonzalezCenter for Community Health Promotion, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 320 N. 16th Street, Sunnyside, WA, 98944, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USNew Mexico State University · USSeattle Pacific University · US

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
Research Education About Cancer and Health (REACH) CoreU54CA132381 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Jean Alison McDougall · 2007 to 2026
$25.3M
Undergraduate Student Training in Cancer ResearchU54CA132383 · NCI · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI MICHELE Irene SHUSTER · 2007 to 2026
$21.4M
Training ProgramU54CA153502 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI THOMPSON, BETI · 2010 to 2015
$4.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCI NIH HHS U53CA153502-05S1NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132381NCI NIH HHS U54CA132381NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132383NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153502NCI NIH HHS U54CA153502NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to assess effects of three different educational intervention arms on knowledge of and intention to receive Pap testing and HPV co-testing.

methodsThree active educational intervention arms were developed: a fotonovela, a radionovela, and a digital story. A pilot randomized controlled trial of 160 Latinas was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the intervention arms in increasing knowledge of cervical cancer and HPV and intention to be screened for cervical cancer compared to an attention control group (flu vaccination).

resultsWomen in all three treatment arms significantly increased knowledge about cervical cancer compared to control arm (p = 0.02). Knowledge about cervical cancer screening also increased in the active arms compared to control (p = 0.0003). Knowledge of HPV risk also increased relative to the control (p = 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the intervention arms in increased knowledge of cervical cancer or cervical cancer screening (p = 0.57 and 0.16, respectively). DISCUSSION: This study supported the use of small media interventions in narrative education form as effective in increasing knowledge and intention to be screened for cervical cancer. The three culturally relevant interventions, built on qualitative data, were all successful in increasing knowledge.

Indexed as

Hispanic or LatinoAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPilot ProjectsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationVaginal SmearsYoung AdultCervical cancerDigital storyEducationFotonovelaHPVLatinasRadionovela

Identifiers

PMID30830494
PMCPMC6459715
OpenAlexW2919717520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.