Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830406›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2018

Reproducibility of non-fasting plasma metabolomics measurements across processing delays.

Ying Wang, Brian D Carter, Susan M Gapstur, Marjorie L McCullough, Mia M Gaudet, Victoria L Stevens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of dried blood spot and plasma sampling for untargeted metabolomics.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The key points in the pre-analytical procedures of blood and urine samples in metabolomics studies.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ying WangBehavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA. ying.wang@cancer.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1241-6252
Brian D CarterBehavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Susan M GapsturBehavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Marjorie L McCulloughBehavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mia M GaudetBehavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Victoria L StevensBehavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProcessing delays after blood collection is a common pre-analytical condition in large epidemiologic studies. It is critical to evaluate the suitability of blood samples with processing delays for metabolomics analysis as it is a potential source of variation that could attenuate associations between metabolites and disease outcomes.

objectivesWe aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of metabolites over extended processing delays up to 48 h. We also aimed to test the reproducibility of the metabolomics platform.

methodsBlood samples were collected from 18 healthy volunteers. Blood was stored in the refrigerator and processed for plasma at 0, 15, 30, and 48 h after collection. Plasma samples were metabolically profiled using an untargeted, ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) platform. Reproducibility of 1012 metabolites over processing delays and reproducibility of the platform were determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with variance components estimated from mixed-effects models.

resultsThe majority of metabolites (approximately 70% of 1012) were highly reproducible (ICCs ≥ 0.75) over 15-, 30- or 48-h processing delays. Nucleotides, energy-related metabolites, peptides, and carbohydrates were most affected by processing delays. The platform was highly reproducible with a median technical ICC of 0.84 (interquartile range 0.68-0.93).

conclusionMost metabolites measured by the UPLC-MS/MS platform show acceptable reproducibility up to 48-h processing delays. Metabolites of certain pathways need to be interpreted cautiously in relation to outcomes in epidemiologic studies with prolonged processing delays.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsCarbohydratesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHealthy VolunteersHumansNucleotidesPeptidesReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryCarbohydratesNucleotidesPeptidesHuman plasmaMass spectrometryMetabolomicsPre-analyticalProcessing delay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.