Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830398›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2018

Characterization of missing values in untargeted MS-based metabolomics data and evaluation of missing data handling strategies.

Kieu Trinh Do, Simone Wahl, Johannes Raffler, Sophie Molnos, Michael Laimighofer, Jerzy Adamski, Karsten Suhre, Konstantin Strauch, Annette Peters, Christian Gieger and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Urine tricarboxylic acid cycle signatures of early-stage diabetic kidney disease.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kieu Trinh DoInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Simone WahlInstitute of Epidemiology II, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Johannes RafflerInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Sophie MolnosInstitute of Epidemiology II, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Michael LaimighoferInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Jerzy AdamskiInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Genome Analysis Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Karsten SuhreDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Konstantin StrauchInstitute of Genetic Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Annette PetersInstitute of Epidemiology II, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Christian GiegerInstitute of Epidemiology II, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Claudia LangenbergMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Isobel D StewartMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fabian J TheisInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Harald GrallertInstitute of Epidemiology II, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Gabi KastenmüllerGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany. g.kastenmueller@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Jan KrumsiekInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz-Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. jan.krumsiek@helmholtz-muenchen.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZX1313CBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03IS2061BEuropean Research Council LatentCausesEuropean Union's Seventh Framework Programme [FP7-Health-F5-2012] 305280Medical Research Council MC_PC_13048Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/1Weill Cornell Medical College Qatar Biomedical Research Program funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntargeted mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics data often contain missing values that reduce statistical power and can introduce bias in biomedical studies. However, a systematic assessment of the various sources of missing values and strategies to handle these data has received little attention. Missing data can occur systematically, e.g. from run day-dependent effects due to limits of detection (LOD); or it can be random as, for instance, a consequence of sample preparation.

methodsWe investigated patterns of missing data in an MS-based metabolomics experiment of serum samples from the German KORA F4 cohort (n = 1750). We then evaluated 31 imputation methods in a simulation framework and biologically validated the results by applying all imputation approaches to real metabolomics data. We examined the ability of each method to reconstruct biochemical pathways from data-driven correlation networks, and the ability of the method to increase statistical power while preserving the strength of established metabolic quantitative trait loci.

resultsRun day-dependent LOD-based missing data accounts for most missing values in the metabolomics dataset. Although multiple imputation by chained equations performed well in many scenarios, it is computationally and statistically challenging. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) imputation on observations with variable pre-selection showed robust performance across all evaluation schemes and is computationally more tractable.

conclusionMissing data in untargeted MS-based metabolomics data occur for various reasons. Based on our results, we recommend that KNN-based imputation is performed on observations with variable pre-selection since it showed robust results in all evaluation schemes.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidCohort StudiesGermanyMetabolomicsBatch effectsK-nearest neighborLimit of detectionMass spectrometryMICEMissing values imputationUntargeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID30830398
PMCPMC6153696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.