Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830380›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2018

Production system influences volatile biomarkers in tomato.

Jisun H J Lee, G K Jayaprakasha, Charlie M Rush, Kevin M Crosby, Bhimanagouda S Patil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jisun H J LeeVegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, 1500 Research Parkway, A120, College Station, TX, 77845-2119, USA.
G K JayaprakashaVegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, 1500 Research Parkway, A120, College Station, TX, 77845-2119, USA.
Charlie M RushPlant Pathology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, and Extension, Amarillo Research & Extension Center, 6500 Amarillo Boulevard West, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA.
Kevin M CrosbyVegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, 1500 Research Parkway, A120, College Station, TX, 77845-2119, USA. k-crosby@tamu.edu.
Bhimanagouda S PatilVegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, 1500 Research Parkway, A120, College Station, TX, 77845-2119, USA. b-patil@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7189-0432

Funding

Texas State Funding 2015-121277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn recent years, growers have used various production types, including high-tunnel systems, to increase the yield of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum). However, the effect of high-tunnel cultivation, in comparison to conventional open-field production, on aroma and flavor volatiles is not fully understood.

objectivesTo optimize the extraction and quantification conditions for the analysis of tomato volatiles using headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and study the effect of production systems on volatile profiles using metabolomics approach.

methodsThe HS-SPME conditions were optimized for extraction and GC-MS was used to quantify the volatiles from four tomato varieties grown in open-field and high-tunnel systems. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the influence of production system on tomato volatiles. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe extraction of 2 g tomato samples at 60 °C for 45 min using divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber gave the maximum amounts of volatiles. This optimized method was used to identify and quantify 41 volatiles from four tomato varieties. The levels of β-damascenone were higher in the high-tunnel tomatoes and geranylacetone was higher in open-field tomatoes. These two volatile compounds could be considered as biomarkers for tomatoes grown in high-tunnel and open-field production systems. This study is the first report comparing volatiles in tomatoes grown in high-tunnel and open-field conditions, and our results confirmed that there is a critical need to adopt biomarker-specific production systems to improve the nutritional and organoleptic properties of tomatoes.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsSolid Phase MicroextractionBiomarkersGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometrySolanum lycopersicumVolatile Organic CompoundsBiomarkersVolatile Organic CompoundsGC–MSHigh-tunnelHS-SPMEMetabolomicsTomatoVolatiles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.