Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830361›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2017

Metabolomic prediction of endometrial cancer.

Ray O Bahado-Singh, Amit Lugade, Jayson Field, Zaid Al-Wahab, BeomSoo Han, Rupasri Mandal, Trent C Bjorndahl, Onur Turkoglu, Stewart F Graham, David Wishart and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cervicovaginal Metabolome and Tumor Characteristics for Endometrial Cancer Detection and Risk Stratification.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ray O Bahado-SinghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. Ray.bahado-singh@beaumont.org.
Amit LugadeCenter for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jayson FieldDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, William Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Zaid Al-WahabDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, William Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
BeomSoo HanDepartments of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E8, Canada.
Rupasri MandalDepartments of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E8, Canada.
Trent C BjorndahlDepartments of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E8, Canada.
Onur TurkogluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.
Stewart F GrahamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.
David WishartDepartments of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E8, Canada.
Kunle OdunsiCenter for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Beaumont Health · USUniversity of Alberta · CARoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndometrial cancer (EC) is associated with metabolic disturbances including obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Identifying metabolite biomarkers for EC detection has a crucial role in reducing morbidity and mortality.

objectiveTo determine whether metabolomic based biomarkers can detect EC overall and early-stage EC.

methodsWe performed NMR and mass spectrometry based metabolomic analyses of serum in EC cases versus controls. A total of 46 early-stage (FIGO stages I-II) and 10 late-stage (FIGO stages III-IV) EC cases constituted the study group. A total of 60 unaffected control samples were used. Patients and controls were divided randomly into a discovery group (n = 69) and an independent validation group (n = 47). Predictive algorithms based on biomarkers and demographic characteristics were generated using logistic regression analysis.

resultsA total of 181 metabolites were evaluated. Extensive changes in metabolite levels were noted in the EC versus the control group. The combination of C14:2, phosphatidylcholine with acyl-alkyl residue sum C38:1 (PCae C38:1) and 3-hydroxybutyric acid had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) (95% CI) = 0.826 (0.706-0.946) and a sensitivity = 82.6%, and specificity = 70.8% for EC overall. For early EC prediction: BMI, C14:2 and PC ae C40:1 had an AUC (95% CI) = 0.819 (0.689-0.95) and a sensitivity = 72.2% and specificity = 79.2% in the validation group.

conclusionsEC is characterized by significant perturbations in important cellular metabolites. Metabolites accurately detected early-stage EC cases and EC overall which could lead to the development of non-invasive biomarkers for earlier detection of EC and for monitoring disease recurrence.

Indexed as

3-Hydroxybutyric AcidAdultAgedBiological AssayBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPhosphatidylcholines3-Hydroxybutyric AcidBiomarkers, TumorPhosphatidylcholinesBiomarkerEndometrial cancerMass spectrometryMetabolomicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID30830361
OpenAlexW2775659660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.