Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30830243›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019

Treatment Strategies and Survival Trends for Anorectal Melanoma: Is it Time for a Change?

James P Taylor, Miloslawa Stem, David Yu, Sophia Y Chen, Sandy H Fang, Susan L Gearhart, Bashar Safar, Jonathan E Efron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Anorectal Amelanotic Melanoma.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Distribution pattern of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor microenvironment composition as prognostic indicators in anorectal malignant melanoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  20. A Rare Case of Primary Anorectal Melanoma and a Review of the Current Landscape of Therapy.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James P TaylorJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Miloslawa StemJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
David YuJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Sophia Y ChenJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Sandy H FangJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Susan L GearhartJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Bashar SafarJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Jonathan E EfronJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. jefron1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotherapy advances for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma question its efficacy in treating anorectal mucosal melanoma (ARMM). We aimed to identify the prevalence, current management, and overall survival (OS) for ARMM.

methodsReview of patients with ARMM from 2004 to 2015 National Cancer Database. Factors associated with immunotherapy were identified using multivariable logistic regression. The primary outcome was 2- and 5-year OS. Subgroup analysis by treatment type was performed.

resultsA total of 1331 patients were identified with a significant increase in prevalence (2004: 6.99%, 2015: 10.53%). ARMM patients were older, white, on Medicare, and from the South. The most common treatment was surgery (48.77%), followed by surgery + radiation (11.75%), surgery + immunotherapy (8.68%), and surgery + chemotherapy (8.68%). 16.93% of patients received immunotherapy, with utilization increasing (7.24%: 2004, 21.27%: 2015, p < 0.001). Patients who received immunotherapy had a significantly better 2-year OS (42.47% vs. 49.21%, p < 0.001), and other therapies did not reveal a significant difference. Adjusted analysis showed no difference in 2- and 5-year OS based on therapy type.

conclusionThe prevalence of ARMM has increased. The use of immunotherapy has increased substantially. Some survival benefit with the administration of immunotherapy may exist that has yet to be revealed. A more aggressive treatment paradigm is warranted.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAnus NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsSurvival RateAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological

Identifiers

PMID30830243
OpenAlexW2918525553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.