Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30829926›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Best Practices for Obtaining Genomic Consent in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Research.

Kaylee C Schnur, Eliana Gill, Alejandro Guerrero, Nicole Osier, Karin Reuter-Rice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaylee C SchnurKaylee C. Schnur is Nursing Honors Undergraduate Student, University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing. She is working toward earning her BSN. Eliana Gill, RN, BSN, is Registered Nurse, Seton Medical Center, Austin, Texas. Alejandro Guerrero is Undergraduate Student, University of Texas at Austin. He is working toward earning a BS in Neuroscience. Nicole Osier, PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing and Department of Neurology, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School. Karin Reuter-Rice, PhD, CPNP-AC, FCCM, FAAN, is Associate Professor, Duke University School of Nursing and Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Eliana Gill
Alejandro Guerrero
Nicole Osier
Karin Reuter-Rice

Funding

Scholarship and Mentoring CoreP30NR014139 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WU, BEI · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR014139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecision health relies on large sample sizes to ensure adequate power, generalizability, and replicability; however, a critical first step to any study is the successful recruitment of participants.

objectivesThis study seeks to explore how the enrollment strategies used in a parent study contributed to the high consent rates, establish current best practices that can be used in future studies, and identify additional factors that contribute to consent into pediatric traumatic brain injury biobanks.

methodsRetrospective secondary analysis of data from a parent study with high consent rates was examined to explore factors affecting consent into biobanking studies.

resultsOf the 76 subjects who were approached, met the eligibility criteria, and reviewed the consent form, only 16 (21.1%) declined to participate. The consented group (n = 60) represents 64.5% of those who met the eligibility criteria upon initial screening (n = 93) and 78.9% of those with confirmed eligibility (n = 76). Analysis of screening data suggested there were no major barriers to consenting individuals into this pediatric traumatic brain injury biobank. DISCUSSION: There were no demographic or research-related characteristics that significantly explained enrollment. Ethically, to obtain true informed consent, parents need to understand only their child's diagnosis, prognosis, and medical care, as well as the purpose of the proposed research and its risks and benefits. Researchers need to implement best practices, including a comprehensive review of census data to identify eligible participants to approach, a prescreening protocol, and effective consenting process to obtain informed consent so that precision care initiatives can be pursued.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticBiological Specimen BanksChildDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleParental ConsentParentsPediatricsPhysician-Patient RelationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30829926
PMCPMC6400301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.