ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2019
Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Sepsis: A Comparison of Characteristics and Outcomes.
Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- The headband that held in the brain: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Performance and practicality of 16S nanopore sequencing for routine bacterial identification in clinical samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Clinical Features and 1-Year Prognosis of Patients with Suspected Sepsis and Positive Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Hyperinflammatory Syndrome of Unknown Origin Complicated by Shock, DIC, Intracranial Hemorrhage and Spontaneous Splenic Rupture: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Atypical Vasculitis Phenotype with Concomitant Medium- and Small-Vessel Involvement: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic and Pathological Challenges.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2026Article
- Machine learning for prediction of in-ICU mortality in sepsis: an observational study using the MIMIC IV database.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Plasma multi-omics reveals pathogen-associated mechanisms and diagnostic signatures inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Validation of a long-read 16S rRNA-gene sequencing approach for analysis of clinical samples and bacterial identification in a routine clinical laboratory.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Mortality rate and predictors of mortality of pediatric sepsis and septic shock in a Moroccan tertiary care center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic utility of D-dimer and heparin-binding protein in neonatal sepsis: A prospective case-control study.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- Determining the Use and Reasons for Non-De-Escalation of Empiric Carbapenem Therapy in a Private Hospital in South Africa.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics, Microbiological Profile, and Mortality Predictors in Pediatric Community-Acquired Sepsis: A Single-Center Study.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2025Article
- A Novel PCR Panel for Bacterial Detection in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study with Culture Results.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Blood culture positive sepsis in England, 2017-2018: epidemiological assessment of the commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUIN) sepsis indicator.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16S rRNA Amplicon-Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Association of Causative Pathogens With Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Patients With Community-Onset Sepsis.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Impact of blood culture positivity on clinical outcomes in sepsis: a prospective observational study.Le infezioni in medicina · 2025Article
- Research progress on human adenovirus sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Culture-negative sepsis may be a different entity from culture-positive sepsis: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Performance of 16S rRNA Gene Next-Generation Sequencing and the Culture Method in the Detection of Bacteria in Clinical Specimens.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe primary objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of culture-positive and culture-negative status in septic patients. We also determined whether culture status is associated with mortality and whether unique variables are associated with mortality in culture-positive and culture-negative patients separately.
methodsUtilizing patient records from intensive care units, emergency department, and general care wards in a large academic medical center, we identified adult patients with suspected infection and ≥2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2014. We compared the characteristics between culture-positive and culture-negative patients and used binary logistic regression to identify variables independently associated with culture status and mortality. We also did sensitivity analyses using patients with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria for sepsis.
resultsThe study population included 9288 culture-negative patients (89%) and 1105 culture-positive patients (11%). Culture-negative patients received more antibiotics during the 48 hours preceding diagnosis but otherwise demonstrated similar characteristics as culture-positive patients. After adjusting for illness severity, a positive culture was not independently associated with mortality (odds ratio = 1.01 [95% CI, 0.81-1.26]; P = .945). The models predicting mortality separately in culture-negative and culture-positive patients demonstrated very good and excellent discrimination (C-statistic ± SD, 0.87 ± 0.01 and 0.92 ± 0.01), respectively. In the sensitivity analyses using patients with sepsis by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria, after adjustments for illness severity, positive cultures were still not associated with mortality (odds ratio = 1.13 [95% CI, 0.86-1.43]; P = .303; and odds ratio = 1.05 [95% CI, 0.83-1.33]; P = .665), respectively. In all models, physiological derangements were associated with mortality.
conclusionsWhile culture status is important for tailoring antibiotics, culture-negative and culture-positive patients with sepsis demonstrate similar characteristics and, after adjusting for severity of illness, similar mortality. The most important factor associated with negative cultures is receipt of antibiotics during the preceding 48 hours. The risk of death in patients suspected of having an infection is most associated with severity of illness. This is aligned with the Sepsis-3 definition using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to better identify those suspected of infection at highest risk of a poor outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.