ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019
Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation: an Underutilized Resource.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Literature Review of Benefits, Challenges, and Emerging Approaches.Cureus · 2025Review
- Effects of the hospital-community-family trinity cardiac rehabilitation on patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized trial.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- Online Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Japanese Patients With Coronary Artery Disease - A Pilot Study Protocol.Circulation reports · 2024Article
- Differential associations of sex and age with changes in HRQoL during outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Intensive Versus Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in a 2016-2020 Retrospective Medicare Cohort.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Article
- The impact of obstructive sleep apnea on exercise capacity in a cardiac rehabilitation program.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Article
- Disparities in Geographic Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation in Los Angeles County.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Lifestyle Medicine Reimbursement: A Proposal for Policy Priorities Informed by a Cross-Sectional Survey of Lifestyle Medicine Practitioners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation in High-Risk Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Real-World Practice.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Cardiac Rehab in the COVID Era and Beyond: mHealth and Other Novel Opportunities.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Unraveling the Role of Respiratory Muscle Metaboloreceptors under Inspiratory Training in Patients with Heart Failure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Cardiac Rehab for Functional Improvement.Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Barriers physicians face when referring patients to cardiac rehabilitation: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Action plan for improving cardiac rehabilitation-related outcomes in a university hospital based on a review of previous interventions.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review evidence-based lifestyle modification strategies for secondary prevention and explore how they are incorporated in traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) programs. RECENT
findingsWhile physical activity is an important element of cardiac rehabilitation, more recent studies support a variety of methods, including stress management and plant-based diets, to reduce cardiovascular risk factors. Patients who participate in traditional CR programs demonstrate clinical improvement, which are significantly greater in intensive CR (ICR). Yet, there is still a disparity in numbers between those who are eligible and those who ultimately enroll. Research into non-surgical and non-pharmacological health management approaches continues to validate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary intensive CR programs, but there is an increasing need to connect patients with these opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.