ArticleeNeurologicalSci2019
CT-guided thrombolytic treatment of patients with wake-up strokes.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke of unknown time of onset: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Pooled it
- Intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients based on non-contrast CT in the extended time-window.Frontiers in stroke · 2022Review
- Thrombolysis in Stroke With Unknown Onset Based on Non-Contrast Computerized Tomography (TRUST CT).Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies of thrombolysis outcomes in wake-up acute ischemic stroke patients selected based on non-contrast brain CT criteria suggested that treated patients did as well as or better than those not treated, after adjustment for baseline characteristics. We began offering thrombolytic treatment (IVTPA) to patients presenting with wake-up strokes and normal non-contrast brain CTs, who could be treated within 4.5 h of being found. DESIGN/
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed in patients presenting with AIS between November 2014 and December 2017 who received IVTPA. A planned subgroup analysis compared patients with wake-up strokes and normal non-contrast brain CTs to patients with witnessed stroke treated within 4.5 h of being found, or of witnessed onset, respectively.
resultsThree hundred and six patients were treated, 279 with witnessed-onset and 27 with wake-up strokes. The latter were not candidates for endovascular intervention. Efficacy and safety were similar in both groups. Discharges home, respectively, were 143(53%) and 13(48%); facility discharges were 112(40.1%) and 11(40.7%) and in-hospital mortality was 19 (6.8%) and 3 (11%). Treatment-related symptomatic bleeds were: 5(1.8%) and 1 (3.7%), respectively.
conclusionsThe findings affirm, in a new clinical series reflecting routine practice, that it is safe to treat with IVTPA patients with wake-up strokes and a normal brain CT scan, who are not candidates for endovascular intervention. We hypothesize, that when the non-contrast brain CT scan is normal, it may be safe to extend beyond 4.5 h the IVTPA treatment eligibility window in similar patients with witnessed-onset stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.