Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30828595›Full record

ArticleTobacco regulatory science2018

Assessing Smoking Cessation Messages with a Discrete Choice Experiment.

James F Thrasher, Dien Anshari, Victoria Lambert-Jessup, Farahnaz Islam, Erin Mead, Lucy Popova, Ramzi Salloum, Crawford Moodie, Jordan Louviere, Eric N Lindblom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco regulatory science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Differential Responses to Cigarette Package Labeling Alternatives Among Adults Who Smoke: Results From a Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  3. Combining Inserts With Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs to Promote Smoking Cessation: A 2-Week Randomized Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reasons for Using Roll-Your-Own Tobacco and Perceptions of Health-Promoting Pack Inserts: A Focus Group Study with Roll-Your-Own Tobacco Smokers in Scotland.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James F ThrasherProfessor, Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Dien AnshariAssistant Professor, Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Victoria Lambert-JessupMSPH Student, Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Farahnaz IslamPhD Student, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Erin MeadAssistant Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Lucy PopovaAssistant Professor, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
Ramzi SalloumAssistant Professor, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Crawford MoodieSenior Research Fellow, Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Jordan LouviereResearch Professor, Institute for Choice and School of Marketing, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Eric N LindblomDirector, O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC.

Funding

Building evidence for effective and sustainable cigarette warning label policyR01CA167067 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI THRASHER, JAMES · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur aim was to identify message characteristics for cigarette pack inserts that aim to help smokers quit.

methodsUS adult smokers from an online consumer panel (N = 665) participated in a discrete choice experiment with a 2x2x2x2x4 within-subjects balanced incomplete block design, manipulating: image (vs no image), text type (testimonial vs informational), cessation resource information (vs none), call to action (vs none), and message topic (well-being, financial benefit, cravings, social support). Participants evaluated 9 choice sets, each with 4 inserts, selecting: (1) the most and least helpful for quitting; and (2) the most and least motivating to quit. Linear models regressed choices on insert characteristics, controlling for sociodemographics and smoking-related variables. We assessed interactions between insert characteristics and smoker attributes (ie, education, quit intention, self-efficacy).

resultsInserts were most helpful and motivating when they included an image, provided cessation resource information, or referenced well-being and financial benefits. Significant interactions indicated that inserts with cessation resource information were relatively more helpful and motivating among smokers with low self-efficacy, an intention to quit, or lower education.

conclusionCigarette pack inserts with imagery and cessation resource information may be particularly effective in promoting smoking cessation.

Indexed as

health communicationhealth policysmoking cessationtobacco control

Identifiers

PMID30828595
PMCPMC6395051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.