Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30828453›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2019

StressadaMente: Mental health promotion program for direct care workers of older people.

Margarida Figueiredo, Laetitia Teixeira, Constança Paúl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margarida FigueiredoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-3536
Laetitia TeixeiraInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Constança PaúlInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the current context, associated with the increase in longevity, there is a greater need for institutionalization of old people in search of formal support. The direct care workers of institutionalized older people, who work at day care centers and residential homes, are at risk of being victims of occupational psychosocial risks. There are several psychological complaints of these workers, highlighting the need to develop a mental health promotion program aiming at job satisfaction of direct care workers, improving their provision of care at work and quality of life.

aimThe StressadaMente program is a mental health promotion program for direct care workers of institutionalized older people in day care centers and residential homes. This article aims to describe the StressadaMente program and to evaluate the level of satisfaction of the direct care workers with the program.

methodsThe program was implemented in two day centers/residential homes, enrolling 25 participants, and comprised one session per week, with 90 min per session, during 7 weeks. Sociodemographic information of direct care workers was collected. The assessment protocol comprised a satisfaction questionnaire of the program.

resultsIn general, the program was evaluated as "very good" and "excellent" by 9.5% and 90.5% of the participants, respectively. These results may indicate that mental health promotion intervention seems to encourage new skills and changes to a better practice, prevent adverse effects of caregiving by improving the mental health of professionals.

Indexed as

day care centerDirect care workersmental healtholder peopleresidential homes

Identifiers

PMID30828453
PMCPMC6390218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.