Articlei-Perception
Object Visibility, Not Energy Expenditure, Accounts For Spatial Biases in Human Grasp Selection.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct Neural Components of Visually Guided Grasping during Planning and Execution.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Manipulation of physical 3-D and virtual 2-D stimuli: comparing digit placement and fixation position.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Predicting precision grip grasp locations on three-dimensional objects.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Humans Can Visually Judge Grasp Quality and Refine Their Judgments Through Visual and Haptic Feedback.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Object Visibility, Not Energy Expenditure, Accounts For Spatial Biases in Human Grasp Selection.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans exhibit spatial biases when grasping objects. These biases may be due to actors attempting to shorten their reaching movements and therefore minimize energy expenditures. An alternative explanation could be that they arise from actors attempting to minimize the portion of a grasped object occluded from view by the hand. We reanalyze data from a recent study, in which a key condition decouples these two competing hypotheses. The analysis reveals that object visibility, not energy expenditure, most likely accounts for spatial biases observed in human grasping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.