ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2019
Bioequivalence of 2 Naproxen Sodium Tablet Formulations in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers.
Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The dose-response effects of flurbiprofen, indomethacin, ibuprofen, and naproxen on primary skeletal muscle cells.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2024Article
- Mitochondrial Stress Links Environmental Triggers with Pro-Inflammatory Signaling in Crohn's Disease.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cucurbituril-assisted sensitive fluorescence detection and quantitation of naproxen drug in wastewater samples: Guest-host characterization and HPLC investigation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- NSAIDs Naproxen, Ibuprofen, Salicylate, and Aspirin Inhibit TRPM7 Channels by Cytosolic Acidification.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNaproxen is an established, effective treatment for pain management in acute musculoskeletal disorders and traumatic sports injuries. Reckitt Benckiser Health Limited have developed a naproxen sodium tablet with the same pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties as existing marketed naproxen products with the intention of increasing the number of naproxen products available for prescribers and pharmacies.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess comparative bioavailability between a test medicinal product developed by Reckitt Benckiser Health Limited (RB, 103-105 Bath Rd, Slough, SL1 3UH, United Kingdom; RB naproxen sodium 220 mg tablets), and a reference medicinal product, Aleve naproxen sodium 220 mg (Bayer B.V., Energieweg 1, 3641 RT Mijdrecht, Netherlands), in the fasted state.
methodsThis was a randomized, single-dose, 2-way crossover, open-label, comparative bioavailability, pharmacokinetic study in 18 healthy male and female volunteers with a 5- to 8-day washout permitted between doses (based on the anticipated minimum washout period for naproxen determined from the known terminal elimination half-life of up to 17 hours). Blood samples were taken periodically over a 72-hour period following dosing and analyzed for plasma naproxen concentration using a validated LC-MS method. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was used to derive pharmacokinetic parameters for naproxen; safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout the study.
resultsFollowing a single-dose administration of naproxen sodium tablets (2 × 220 mg), the C
conclusionsThis single-dose study found that the test product (RB naproxen sodium tablets) and reference product (Aleve naproxen sodium tablets) met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these fasted male and female volunteers; both test and reference products were found to be safe and well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.