Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30828369›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2019

Can threatened species adapt in a restored habitat? No expected evolutionary response in lay date for the New Zealand hihi.

Pierre de Villemereuil, Alexis Rutschmann, John G Ewen, Anna W Santure, Patricia Brekke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Conservation should assume realistic adaptive capacities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fluctuating optimum and temporally variable selection on breeding date in birds and mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pierre de VillemereuilSchool of Biological Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8791-6104
Alexis RutschmannSchool of Biological Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.
John G EwenInstitute of Zoology Zoological Society of London London UK.
Anna W SantureSchool of Biological Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-1042
Patricia BrekkeInstitute of Zoology Zoological Society of London London UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many bird species have been observed shifting their laying date to earlier in the year in response to climate change. However, the vast majority of these studies were performed on non-threatened species, less impacted by reduced genetic diversity (which is expected to limit evolutionary response) as a consequence of genetic bottlenecks, drift and population isolation. Here, we study the relationship between lay date and fitness, as well as its genetic basis, to understand the evolutionary constraints on phenology faced by threatened species using a recently reintroduced population of the endangered New Zealand passerine, the hihi (

Indexed as

conservation biologylaying dateNotiomystis cinctaphenologyquantitative genetics

Identifiers

PMID30828369
PMCPMC6383709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.