Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30828362›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2019

A roadmap for urban evolutionary ecology.

L Ruth Rivkin, James S Santangelo, Marina Alberti, Myla F J Aronson, Charlotte W de Keyzer, Sarah E Diamond, Marie-Josée Fortin, Lauren J Frazee, Amanda J Gorton, Andrew P Hendry and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

L Ruth RivkinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-3388
James S SantangeloDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5921-2548
Marina AlbertiDepartment of Urban Design and Planning University of Washington Seattle Washington.
Myla F J AronsonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey.
Charlotte W de KeyzerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Sarah E DiamondDepartment of Biology Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio.
Marie-Josée FortinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Lauren J FrazeeDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey.
Amanda J GortonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota.
Andrew P HendryRedpath Museum and Department of Biology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada.
Yang LiuDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3479-9223
Jonathan B LososMuseum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts.
J Scott MacIvorDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2443-8192
Ryan A MartinDepartment of Biology Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio.
Mark J McDonnellSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Lindsay S MilesIntegrative Life Sciences Doctoral Program Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia.
Jason Munshi-SouthLouis Calder Center-Biological Field Station Fordham University Armonk New York.
Robert W NessDepartment of Biology University of Toronto Mississauga Mississauga Ontario Canada.
Amy E M NewmanDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada.
Mason R StothartDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada.
Panagiotis TheodorouGeneral Zoology, Institute of Biology Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany.
Ken A ThompsonBiodiversity Research Centre and Department of Zoology University of British Columbia British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-3254
Brian C VerrelliCenter for Life Sciences Education Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia.
Andrew WhiteheadDepartment of Environmental Toxicology University of California Davis Davis California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-6449
Kristin M WinchellDepartment of Biology Washington University in Saint Louis Saint Louis Missouri.
Marc T J JohnsonDepartment of Biology University of Toronto Mississauga Mississauga Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9719-0522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban ecosystems are rapidly expanding throughout the world, but how urban growth affects the evolutionary ecology of species living in urban areas remains largely unknown. Urban ecology has advanced our understanding of how the development of cities and towns change environmental conditions and alter ecological processes and patterns. However, despite decades of research in urban ecology, the extent to which urbanization influences evolutionary and eco-evolutionary change has received little attention. The nascent field of urban evolutionary ecology seeks to understand how urbanization affects the evolution of populations, and how those evolutionary changes in turn influence the ecological dynamics of populations, communities, and ecosystems. Following a brief history of this emerging field, this Perspective article provides a research agenda and roadmap for future research aimed at advancing our understanding of the interplay between ecology and evolution of urban-dwelling organisms. We identify six key questions that, if addressed, would significantly increase our understanding of how urbanization influences evolutionary processes. These questions consider how urbanization affects nonadaptive evolution, natural selection, and convergent evolution, in addition to the role of urban environmental heterogeneity on species evolution, and the roles of phenotypic plasticity versus adaptation on species' abundance in cities. Our final question examines the impact of urbanization on evolutionary diversification. For each of these six questions, we suggest avenues for future research that will help advance the field of urban evolutionary ecology. Lastly, we highlight the importance of integrating urban evolutionary ecology into urban planning, conservation practice, pest management, and public engagement.

Indexed as

citizen sciencecommunity engagementeco‐evolutionary feedbackgene flowlandscape geneticsurban evolutionurban socioecology

Identifiers

PMID30828362
PMCPMC6383741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.