ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2019
Outcomes of Oral Metronomic Therapy in Patients with Lymphomas.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time toxicity during palliative chemotherapy for advanced malignancies: a prospective study.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2025Observational
- All-Oral Low-Dose Chemotherapy TEPIP is Effective and Well-Tolerated in Relapsed/Refractory Patients With Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral Metronomic chemotherapy (OMC) is used in patients with lymphoma who may not tolerate intravenous chemotherapy or have refractory disease. It is cheaper, less toxic and easy to administer. Adult patients with lymphoma who received OMC (combination of cyclophosphamide, etoposide and prednisolone) were included in this retrospective analysis. Response assessment was clinical with limited use of radiology. Progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS) were calculated from the time of start of OMC until documentation of disease progression or death. Between 2007 and 2017, 149 patients were given OMC [median age: 62 years (19-87); 94 patients (63.1%) male]. Majority [112 patients (75.2%)] had stage III/IV disease. The most common subtype of lymphoma was diffuse large B cell lymphoma (40.9%). OMC was used at diagnosis in 41 patients (27.5%) and after relapse in 108 patients (72.5%). Overall response rates were 43.9 and 41.7% with clinical CR in 14 (34.1%) and 21 (19.4%) in patients given first line and later lines of OMC respectively. After a median follow up of 12 months (range 1-123 months), median PFS and OS were 10.5 (95% CI 8.6-12.5) and 18.8 (95% CI 12.1-25.5) months respectively. PFS and OS at 12 months were 47.6 and 64.2% respectively. Though OMC is used in many centers in India, there is scanty published information on its efficacy in lymphoma. In this analysis, we demonstrate its activity in a subset of patients with predominantly high-grade and advanced stage NHL. OMC is a useful option in frail patients and a small proportion can achieve deep and long lasting responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.