ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2019
Outcomes Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Non-sibling Family Donors.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thalassemia-free and graft-versus-host-free survival: outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia major, Turkish experience.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
- Highlights of Abstracts on Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Annual Conference of ISHBT 2018.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For patients requiring allogeneic stem cell transplant, in the absence of a HLA-matched sibling, an extended donor search within the family may yield a suitable donor especially in societies with a high prevalence of consanguinity. We describe outcomes in transplants with non-sibling family donors, and compare outcomes with controls having a sibling donor transplant. Retrospective analysis of all matched related (non-sibling) donor transplants between 1995 and 2015. For comparison, appropriate age, sex and disease-matched patients were chosen from the sibling transplants (MSD) performed during the same time period (± 2 years). Comparison between the fully matched non-sibling donor cohort and age, sex and disease-matched sibling donor transplants showed a significant increase in complications in the family donor group (viral infections, acute GVHD and rejection). Event-free survival and overall survival were significantly lower in the non-sibling donor cohort, and HLA disparity (1-2 antigen) further worsened the adverse impact. Though there was a significantly lower event-free and overall survival at 3 years in the family donor cohort, this did not retain significance in the multivariate analysis. This data on allogeneic transplants using family donors showed higher complication rates and poorer outcomes. However in situations where financial constraints prevent access to matched unrelated donor sources, extended family searches may be fruitful in yielding a donor, and modifications in conditioning regimens and improvement in supportive care may help in improving the outcomes in family donor transplants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.