Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30828146›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2019

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Long-Term Outcome Data in the Imatinib Era.

Prasanth Ganesan, Trivadi S Ganesan, Venkatraman Radhakrishnan, Tenali Gnana Sagar, Krishnarathinam Kannan, Manikandan Dhanushkodi, Jayachandran Perumal Kalayarasi, Nikita Mehra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Meeting the needs of CML patients in resource-poor countries.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2019
    Review
  6. CML in India: Are We There Yet?Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prasanth GanesanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-6591
Trivadi S GanesanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Venkatraman RadhakrishnanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Tenali Gnana SagarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Krishnarathinam KannanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Manikandan DhanushkodiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Jayachandran Perumal KalayarasiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Nikita MehraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Chennai, India.
Cancer Institute (WIA) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reports suggest that in the TKI era, the survival of chronic myeloid leukemia approaches that of general population. The real-world situation may be different. We analyzed patients (≥ 18 years) with chronic phase (CP) CML enrolled over a 7-year period (2002-2008) in an imatinib access program. Event was defined as non-achievement/loss of complete hematological response (CHR), loss of cytogenetic response or progression to accelerated (AP)/blast phase (BC). Progression was defined as development of AP/BC. Any delay of ≥ 1 week in reporting for drug refills was categorized as non-adherence. Of the 443 patients with CP-CML who started imatinib [median age: 36 years (18-70); High risk: 32% (Sokal) and 14% (Hasford/EUTOS)], 162 (37%) had received prior therapy [mostly hydroxyurea (N = 153]. CHR was achieved by 430 (97%). After a median follow up of 109.5 months (3.4-184.3), the EFS, PFS and OS at 10 years was 43%, 75% and 76% respectively. Superior EFS was predicted by low-risk Hasford score and adherence to therapy. Adherence to therapy was the only factor which predicted EFS on multivariate analysis (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.83,

Indexed as

10-Year survivalAdherenceChronic myeloid leukemiaImatinibLong-term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30828146
PMCPMC6369098
OpenAlexW2890845310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.