Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30827293›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2019

The unheard voice: a qualitative exploration of companions' experiences of liaison psychiatry and mental health crises in the emergency department.

Jennifer Collom, Emma Patterson, Geoff Lawrence-Smith, Derek K Tracy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer CollomSchool of Medicine, St George's University of London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-3719
Emma PattersonWarwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, UK.
Geoff Lawrence-SmithOxleas NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Derek K TracyOxleas NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-9407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and methodTo understand the experience of companions of patients seen in the emergency department by liaison psychiatry teams. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling following a recent visit to the emergency department of an inner- or outer-London hospital. Semi-structured interviews were administered to all participants.

resultsTwo major themes were generated. The first concerned the appropriateness of the clinical space, in which 'noise', 'privacy' and the 'waiting area' were subthemes. The second was communication with staff, including subthemes of 'wanting more information' and a 'desire to be more involved'.Clinical implicationsLiaison psychiatry services should consider appropriateness of the clinical space, promoting improved communication between staff and patients' companions, and a review of the information provided to companions in the emergency department. This research offers a novel perspective on liaison psychiatry and will enhance current understanding and clinical practice.Declaration of interestNone.

Indexed as

carerscompanionsEmergency departmentliaison psychiatryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30827293
PMCPMC12402925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.