Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30827259›Full record

ArticleCurrent drug safety2019

Positive and Negative Effects of Antipsychotic Medication: An International Online Survey of 832 Recipients.

John Read, James Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Helping people to discontinue antipsychotics: if, when and how.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Survey of 1144 ECT Recipients, Family Members and Friends: Does ECT Work?International journal of mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John ReadSchool of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom.
James WilliamsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic medication is currently the treatment of choice for psychosis, but few studies directly survey the first-hand experience of recipients.

objectiveTo ascertain the experiences and opinions of an international sample of users of antipsychotic drugs, regarding positive and negative effects.

methodsAn online direct-to-consumer questionnaire was completed by 832 users of antipsychotics, from 30 countries - predominantly USA, UK and Australia. This is the largest such sample to date.

resultsOver half (56%) thought, the drugs reduced the problems they were prescribed for, but 27% thought they made them worse. Slightly less people found the drugs generally 'helpful' (41%) than found them 'unhelpful' (43%). While 35% reported that their 'quality of life' was 'improved', 54% reported that it was made 'worse'. The average number of adverse effects reported was 11, with an average of five at the 'severe' level. Fourteen effects were reported by 57% or more participants, most commonly: 'Drowsiness, feeling tired, sedation' (92%), 'Loss of motivation' (86%), 'Slowed thoughts' (86%), and 'Emotional numbing' (85%). Suicidality was reported to be a side effect by 58%. Older people reported particularly poor outcomes and high levels of adverse effects. Duration of treatment was unrelated to positive outcomes but significantly related to negative outcomes. Most respondents (70%) had tried to stop taking the drugs. The most common reasons people wanted to stop were the side effects (64%) and worries about long-term physical health (52%). Most (70%) did not recall being told anything at all about side effects.

conclusionClinical implications are discussed, with a particular focus on the principles of informed consent, and involving patients in decision making about their own lives.

Indexed as

AdultAntipsychotic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSuicideSurveys and QuestionnairesAntipsychotic AgentsAntipsychotic drugsmaudsley side effectspsychosissecond generationsedationsuicidality.TAE

Identifiers

PMID30827259
PMCPMC6864560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.