Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30827252›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reviews2020

Renal Innervation in Resistant Hypertension: A Review of Pathophysiology and Renal Denervation as Potential Treatment.

Anthony L Wilson, Jason Gandhi, Yiji Suh, Gunjan Joshi, Noel L Smith, Sardar Ali Khan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Possible organ-protective effects of renal denervation: insights from basic studies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony L WilsonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.
Jason GandhiDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.
Yiji SuhDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.
Gunjan JoshiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Stony Brook Southampton Hospital, Southampton, NY 11968, United States.
Noel L SmithFoley Plaza Medical, New York, NY 10007, United States.
Sardar Ali KhanDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States.
Stony Brook School · USSouthampton Hospital · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in treatment and increased awareness have improved the prognosis for many patients with hypertension (HTN). Resistant hypertension (RH) refers to a subset of hypertensive individuals who fail to achieve a desired blood pressure (BP) despite concurrent use of 3 different classes antihypertensive agents, one being a diuretic, and proper lifestyle changes. The prevalence and prognosis of RH are unclear owing to its heterogeneous etiologies, risk factors, and secondary comorbidities. Previous research has provided evidence that increased renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) within the renal artery contributes to RH development. Renal denervation (RDN) is a procedure that attempts to ameliorate the effects of heightened RSNA via ablation renal sympathetic fibers. BP reductions associated with RDN may be attributed to decreased norepinephrine spillover, restoration of natriuresis, increasing renal blood flow, and lowering plasma renin activity. Early clinical trials perpetuated positive results, and enthusiasm grew exponentially. However, recent clinical trials have called into question RDN's efficacy. Numerous limitations must be addressed to discern the true effectiveness of RDN as a therapeutic option for RH.

objectiveWe aimed to review the current understanding of RH, the anatomy of renal arteries, physiology of RH on renal arteries, anatomical pathways of the sympathetic involved in RH, RDN as a treatment option, and all relevant clinical trials treating RH with RDN.

methodsWe piloted a MEDLINE® database search of literature extending from 1980 to 2017, with emphasis on the previous five years, combining keywords such as "resistant hypertension" and "renal denervation."

conclusionA plethora of information is available regarding heightened RSNA leading to RH. RDN as a possible treatment option has shown a range of results. Reconciling RDN's true efficacy requires future trials to increased sites of nerve ablation, standardized protocol, increased anatomical understanding per individual basis, stricter guidelines regarding study design, increased operator experience, and integrating the use of a multielectrode catheter.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCatheter AblationSympathectomyAntihypertensive AgentsDrug ResistanceEssential HypertensionHumansKidneyRenal ArteryTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsnerve ablationrenal arteryrenal denervationrenal sympathetic nerve activityResistant hypertensionstroke

Identifiers

PMID30827252
PMCPMC7527543
OpenAlexW2920224206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.