Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30827214›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2019

A review on computational modelling of phase-transition problems.

Hector Gomez, Miguel Bures, Adrian Moure

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Phase-Field Model for Wet Snow Metamorphism.Crystal growth & design · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tools for computational analysis of moving boundary problems in cellular mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  6. Patterns in soft and biological matters.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Heterogeneous materials: metastable and non-ergodic internal structures.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hector GomezSchool of Mechanical Engineering , Purdue University , 585 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, 47907 IN , USA.
Miguel BuresSchool of Mechanical Engineering , Purdue University , 585 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, 47907 IN , USA.
Adrian MoureSchool of Mechanical Engineering , Purdue University , 585 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, 47907 IN , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase-transition problems are ubiquitous in science and engineering. They have been widely studied via theory, experiments and computations. This paper reviews the main challenges associated with computational modelling of phase-transition problems, addressing both model development and numerical discretization of the resulting equations. We focus on classical phase-transition problems, including liquid-solid, gas-liquid and solid-solid transformations. Our review has a strong emphasis on the treatment of interfacial phenomena and the phase-field method. This article is part of the theme issue 'Heterogeneous materials: metastable and non-ergodic internal structures'.

Indexed as

computational methodsphase-field modellingphase transition

Identifiers

PMID30827214
PMCPMC6460062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.