ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2019
Improving the theoretical description of charge transport in organic crystals.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Charge hopping based on Marcus theory is often used to predict charge carrier mobilities in organic crystals, although it is known to systematically underestimate the values. Here we show that this deficiency may lie on a fundamental aspect of quantum statistical averages, rather than on the approximation itself. Under adequate Boltzmann weighing procedure used to evaluate electron and hole transfer integrals, a kinetic Monte Carlo model is employed to describe mobilities in an azacene derivative. The values are in good agreement with experimental data suggesting that the evaluation of transfer integrals may be the weak link in hopping transport models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30826977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.