Re-expansion pulmonary oedema in pneumothorax.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Suspected Pancreatic-Pleural Fistula Presenting With Massive Pleural Effusion Complicated by Fatal Re-expansion Pulmonary Edema.Cureus · 2026
   Article
2. Fatal Delayed-Onset Bilateral Re-Expansion Pulmonary Edema After Pleural Drainage: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025
   Article
3. A Practical Approach to Pneumothorax Management.Pulmonary therapy · 2025
   Article
4. Risk factors for re-expansion pulmonary edema following chest tube drainage in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2024
   Review
5. Reexpansion pulmonary edema: A rare complication of pneumothorax drainage.Turkish journal of emergency medicine
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as