ArticleiScience2019
Olfactory Object Recognition Based on Fine-Scale Stimulus Timing in Drosophila.
Article in iScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Olfactory cues and memories in animal navigation.Nature reviews. Physics · 2024Article
- Olfactory receptor neurons are sensitive to stimulus onset asynchrony: implications for odor source discrimination.Chemical senses · 2024Article
- Extracting spatial information from temporal odor patterns: insights from insects.Current opinion in insect science · 2023Review
- Temporal novelty detection and multiple timescale integration drive Drosophila orientation dynamics in temporally diverse olfactory environments.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Coupling of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons to Fluctuating Odor Pulses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Reduced olfactory acuity in recently flightless insects suggests rapid regressive evolution.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Connectomic features underlying diverse synaptic connection strengths and subcellular computation.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Non-synaptic interactions between olfactory receptor neurons, a possible key feature of odor processing in flies.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A spiking neural program for sensorimotor control during foraging in flying insects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Segregation of Unknown Odors From Mixtures Based on Stimulus Onset Asynchrony in Honey Bees.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Odorants of behaviorally relevant objects (e.g., food sources) intermingle with those from other sources. Therefore to determine whether an odor source is good or bad-without actually visiting it-animals first need to segregate the odorants from different sources. To do so, animals could use temporal stimulus cues, because odorants from one source exhibit correlated fluctuations, whereas odorants from different sources are less correlated. However, the behaviorally relevant timescales of temporal stimulus cues for odor source segregation remain unclear. Using behavioral experiments with free-flying flies, we show that (1) odorant onset asynchrony increases flies' attraction to a mixture of two odorants with opposing innate or learned valence and (2) attraction does not increase when the attractive odorant arrives first. These data suggest that flies can use stimulus onset asynchrony for odor source segregation and imply temporally precise neural mechanisms for encoding odors and for segregating them into distinct objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.