Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30826584›Full record

ArticleCognitive psychology2019

Looking for Mr(s) Right: Decision bias can prevent us from finding the most attractive face.

Nicholas Furl, Bruno B Averbeck, Ryan T McKay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas FurlDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom. Electronic address: nicholas.furl@rhul.ac.uk.
Bruno B AverbeckNIMH/NIH, 49 Convent Drive, MSC 4415, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, United States.
Ryan T McKayDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom.
Royal Holloway University of London · GBNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Frontal Striatal Systems and Dopamine in Normal and Pathological BehaviorZIAMH002928 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI AVERBECK, BRUNO · 2010 to 2025
$29.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In realistic and challenging decision contexts, people may show biases that prevent them from choosing their favored options. For example, astronomer Johannes Kepler famously interviewed several candidate fiancées sequentially, but was rejected when attempting to return to a previous candidate. Similarly, we examined human performance on searches for attractive faces through fixed-length sequences by adapting optimal stopping computational theory developed from behavioral ecology and economics. Although economics studies have repeatedly found that participants sample too few options before choosing the best-ranked number from a series, we instead found overlong searches with many sequences ending without choice. Participants employed irrationally high choice thresholds, compared to the more lax, realistic standards of a Bayesian ideal observer, which achieved better-ranked faces. We consider several computational accounts and find that participants most resemble a Bayesian model that decides based on altered attractiveness values. These values may produce starkly different biases in the facial attractiveness domain than in other decision domains.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingFacial ExpressionBiasFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPhysical Appearance, BodyBayesian modelingDecision makingFacial attractivenessMate choiceOptimal stopping

Identifiers

PMID30826584
PMCPMC6993934
OpenAlexW2920000524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.