ArticleNeuroscience2019
Assessing Cochlear-Place Specific Temporal Coding Using Multi-Band Complex Tones to Measure Envelope-Following Responses.
Article in Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consequences and Mechanisms of Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss, With Focuses on Signal Perception in Noise and Temporal Processing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- The slowest timescales of neural synchronization reveal the strongest influence of auditory distraction.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Brainstem auditory physiology in children with listening difficultiesHearing research · 2023Article
- Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Noninvasive Measures of Distorted Tonotopic Speech Coding Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that envelope-following responses (EFRs) reveal important differences in temporal coding fidelity amongst listeners who have normal hearing thresholds, consistent with these listeners differing in the degree to which they suffer from cochlear synaptopathy. Like conventional hearing loss, the severity of cochlear synaptopathy may vary along the cochlea. A number of earlier studies have suggested methods for estimating EFRs driven by specific frequency regions of the cochlea, which would allow synaptopathy to be estimated as a function of cochlear place. Here, we tested a method for measuring EFRs from multiple locations along the cochlea simultaneously, using narrowband stimuli. We compared responses to multiple simultaneous narrowband complex harmonic tones in three non-overlapping frequency bands, each having a unique fundamental frequency, to responses to the individual narrowband stimuli alone, and to responses when noise was added to different combinations of the frequency bands. Our results suggest that simultaneous presentation of multiple tone complexes with different fundamental frequencies leads to repeatable measures of temporal coding fidelity at the cochlear frequency regions corresponding to the narrowband carrier frequencies. Other results suggested that while off-frequency contributions to EFRs driven by narrowband signals (due to spread of excitation) can add destructively to the on frequency response, these interactions were small compared to EFR magnitude. Overall, our results point to the utility of using multi-band complex tone stimuli to estimate the profile of temporal coding fidelity, and thus the degree of synaptopathy, as a function of cochlear place. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, Central Gain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.