Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30826162›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior2019

Beyond Nutrient Intake: Use of Digital Food Photography Methodology to Examine Family Dinnertime.

Morgan L McCloskey, Susan L Johnson, Traci A Bekelman, Corby K Martin, Laura L Bellows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Morgan L McCloskeyDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Susan L JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Traci A BekelmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Corby K MartinPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Laura L BellowsDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Electronic address: laura.bellows@colostate.edu.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI JUDD E SHELLITO · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Sujoy Ghosh · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
NIDDK National Research Service Award (NRSA) T32 Diversity Administrative SupplementT32DK007658 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Kristen Elizabeth Boyle, Ihuoma U Eneli · 1991 to 2026
$6.0M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD085257NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007658NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the feasibility of using an image-based food photography methodology (Remote Food Photography Method) in a rural, low-resource audience and use the photos to examine the context of family dinner.

designParents used the SmartIntake app on study-issued tablets to take before and after photos of their and their child's dinner for about 7 nights and participated in a mini-focus group to discuss their experience with the Remote Food Photography Method.

settingSix Head Start/preschool centers in rural Colorado.

participantsMother-child dyads (n = 31). VARIABLES MEASURED: Number and quality of photos received, participant feedback, meal timing, concordance, location, preparation, and quality. ANALYSIS: The researchers assessed feasibility via practicality (percent photos received) and acceptability (general inductive approach used to analyze mini-focus group transcripts for participant feedback); time stamps, meal quality, and food preparation scales were used to analyze dinner photos.

resultsThe majority of photographs (738 of 864) were received. Participants reacted favorably to the methodology; for some, it led to greater self-reflection about mealtime. Mother-child dyads usually ate dinner at the same time and often ate the same food. Children were frequently served protein and refined grains and were rarely served whole grains or fruit. Many families relied on convenience foods. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Digital food photography was feasible in this audience. Photos yielded a holistic picture of family dinnertime: meal timing, location, concordance in parent-child meals, level of preparation, and meal quality.

Indexed as

FoodMealsNutritive ValueColoradoComputers, HandheldDietFamilyFeasibility StudiesFocus GroupsHumansMother-Child RelationsNutrientsPhotographyPovertyRural PopulationNutrientsdinnerfamily mealtimesfood photographymother–child dyadspreschool

Identifiers

PMID30826162
PMCPMC6511478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.