Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30826138›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2019

Novel multilayer meniscal scaffold provides biomechanical and histological results comparable to polyurethane scaffolds: An 8 week rabbit study.

Nihat Demirhan Demirkıran, Hasan Havıtçıoğlu, Aylin Ziylan, Ülker Cankurt, Buğra Hüsemoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Dendritic cell biocompatibility of ether-based urethane films.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nihat Demirhan DemirkıranDepartment of Orthopedics, Dumlupinar University Evliya Celebi Education and Research Hospital, Kutahya, Turkey. Electronic address: drdemirhandemirkiran@gmail.com.
Hasan HavıtçıoğluDepartment of Orthopedics, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Aylin ZiylanFaculty of Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ülker CankurtDepartment of Histology, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Buğra HüsemoğluDepartment of Biomechanics, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the meniscal regeneration and arthritic changes after partial meniscectomy and application of either polyurethane scaffold or novel multilayer meniscal scaffold in a rabbit model.

methodsSixteen NewZealand rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. A reproducible 1.5-mm cylindrical defect was created in the avascular zone of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus bilaterally. Defects were filled with the polyurethane scaffold in Group 1 (n:6) and with novel multilayer scaffold in Group 2 (n:6). Rabbits in Group 3 (n:4) did not receive any treatment and defects were left empty. All animals were sacrificed after 8 weeks and bilateral knee joints were taken for macroscopic, biomechanical, and histological analysis. After excision of menisci, inked condylar surfaces and tibial plateaus were evaluated for arthritic changes. Digital photographs of excised menisci were also obtained and surface areas were measured by a computer software. Indentation testing of the tibial condyles and compression tests for the relevant meniscal areas was also performed in all groups. Histological analysis was made and all specimens were scored according to Rodeo scoring system.

resultsNo signs of inflammation or infection were observed in any animals. A significant difference was observed between meniscus surface areas of the multilayer scaffold group (20.13 ± 1.91 mm

conclusionsIn this study, the initial evaluation of novel multilayer meniscal scaffold prevented the shrinkage that may occur in the meniscus area and demonstrated superior biomechanical results compared to empty defects. No adverse events related to scaffold material was observed. Besides, promising biomechanical and histological results, comparable to polyurethane scaffold, were obtained.

Indexed as

ArthritisMeniscectomyTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsMeniscusPolyurethanesPostoperative ComplicationsRabbitsRegenerationTibial Meniscus InjuriesTreatment OutcomeBiocompatible MaterialsPolyurethanesComposite scaffoldLuffa Cylindirica fiberMeniscal scaffoldMulti-layer meniscus scaffoldPHBVStrontium ranelate

Identifiers

PMID30826138
PMCPMC6506817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.