Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30826024›Full record

ReviewPET clinics2019

Gating Approaches in Cardiac PET Imaging.

Martin Lyngby Lassen, Jacek Kwiecinski, Piotr J Slomka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PET clinics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Head-to-head comparison ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Coronary artery disease imaging with total-body PET.The British journal of radiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced accuracy of cardiacEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From incidental positron emission uptake toFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Reproducibility ofCurrent cardiology reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Value of PET ECG gating in a cross-validation study of cardiac function assessment by PET/MR imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Advanced Cardiac Imaging in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  16. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Martin Lyngby LassenCedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Jacek KwiecinskiCedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Piotr J SlomkaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. Electronic address: Piotr.Slomka@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Integrated analysis of coronary anatomy and biology with 18F-fluoride PET and CT angiographyR01HL135557 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2017 to 2020
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac PET provides high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and cardiomyopathies. Cardiac, respiratory as well as bulk patient motion have detrimental effects on thoracic PET imaging, in particular on cardiovascular PET imaging where the motion can affect the PET images quantitatively as well as qualitatively. Gating can ameliorate the unfavorable impact of motion additionally enabling evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. In this article, the authors review the recent advances in gating approaches and highlight the advances in data-driven approaches, which hold promise in motion detection without the need for complex hardware setup.

Indexed as

Cardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesCardiomyopathiesElectrocardiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMultimodal ImagingMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRespiratory-Gated Imaging TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityCardiac gatingCardiac imagingPET/CT imagingPET/MR imagingRespiratory gating

Identifiers

PMID30826024
PMCPMC6793993
OpenAlexW2913989203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.