Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825811›Full record

ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2019

Perturbation-evoked lateral steps in older adults: Why take two steps when one will do?

J Borrelli, R A Creath, D Pizac, H Hsiao, O P Sanders, M W Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J BorrelliUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA.
R A CreathUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA.
D PizacUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA.
H HsiaoUniversity of Texas at Austin, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, TX, USA.
O P SandersUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA.
M W RogersUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: mwrogers@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (UM-OAIC)P30AG028747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ALICE S. RYAN · 2006 to 2026
$28.9M
Intervention to Enhance Lateral Balance Function and Prevent Falls in AgingR01AG033607 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ROGERS, MARK W · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
ACL HHS 90AR5004NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028747NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip fractures in older adults often result from a fall in the lateral direction. While younger adults tend to recover balance from a lateral perturbation with a single lateral sidestep, older adults are prone to multistep responses which are associated with an increased fall risk. This study compared the stepping characteristics and stability of single and multistep responses to lateral perturbation in healthy older adults.

methodsEighty-four older adults received lateral waist-pull perturbations to either side. Spatio-temporal stepping characteristics and balance stability were quantified.

findingsFewer steps were taken to recover balance when the first step was a lateral sidestep. The stability margin of single lateral sidesteps was greater than medial sidesteps and cross-over steps to the back but not significantly different from single cross-over steps to the front at step termination. Single step responses were more stable than multistep responses at step termination and at step initiation for lateral sidesteps and cross-over steps to the front. The decreased stability of multistep responses was attributed to an increased center of mass velocity and a smaller distance between the center of mass and base-of-support at step termination.

interpretationAlthough lateral sidesteps result in fewer steps than cross-over steps to the front, the stability margin was not significantly different at step termination. These results suggest difficulty terminating center of mass motion and/or inefficient center of mass control differentiates single and multistep responses. Future studies should investigate perturbation training and/or hip abductor muscle conditioning as a means of improving compensatory stepping reactions.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceWalkingAccidental FallsAgedFemaleHipHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementMuscle, SkeletalPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAgingBalanceFallsPerturbationRehabilitationStepping

Identifiers

PMID30825811
PMCPMC6501204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.