Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825728›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2019

Sex-specific scanning in infancy: Developmental changes in the use of face/head and body information.

Hannah White, Rachel Jubran, Alison Heck, Alyson Chroust, Ramesh S Bhatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Infants' identification of gender in biological motion displays.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Body structure processing and attentional patterns in infancy and adulthood.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah WhiteUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Rachel JubranUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Alison HeckUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Alyson ChroustUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Ramesh S BhattUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA. Electronic address: rbhatt@email.uky.edu.

Funding

The development of emotion processing in infancyR01HD075829 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BHATT, RAMESH S · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current investigation sought to differentiate between contrasting perspectives of body knowledge development by determining whether infants' adult-like scanning of male and female bodies is dependent on relevant information from the face/head alone, the body alone, or a combination of both sources. Scanning patterns of 3.5-, 6.5-, and 9-month-olds (N = 80) in response to images that contained information relevant to sex classification in either the face/head or the body were examined. The results indicate that sex-specific scanning in the presence of only one source of relevant information (i.e., face/head or body) is present only at 9 months. Thus, although sex-specific scanning of bodies emerges as early as 3.5 months, information from both faces/heads and bodies is required until sometime between 6.5 and 9 months of age. These findings constrain theories of the development of social perception by documenting the complex interplay between body and face/head processing early in life.

Indexed as

HeadHuman BodySocial PerceptionAge FactorsChild DevelopmentEye MovementsFaceFemaleHumansInfantMaleAttentionFace and body knowledge in infancySex perception in infancySocial CognitionSocial information processingVisual scanning

Identifiers

PMID30825728
PMCPMC6414250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.