Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825497›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2019

Is Treatment Working? Detecting Real Change in the Treatment of Child and Adolescent Depression.

Freda F Liu, Molly C Adrian

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Freda F LiuUniversity of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: freda.liu@seattlechildrens.org.
Molly C AdrianUniversity of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS K12 HS021686AHRQ HHS K12 HS022982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite advances in evidence-based treatments for youth depression in recent decades, overall treatment effects are modest at best, with 30% to 50% of youth being nonresponders. Practice parameters consistently recommend systematic assessment and routine monitoring of depressive symptoms, or measurement-based care (MBC), to enhance youth depression treatment. However, the literature offers few guidelines on how to use assessment results to inform care decisions or to detect real and clinically meaningful change. Thus the current study produced reliable change indices (RCIs) per Jacobson and Truax for two commonly used standardized assessments of youth depression (ie, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items, Modified for Adolescents [PHQ-9A], the Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire [SMFQ]).

methodThe study sample (N = 1,738) consisted of youths 6 to 18 years old seen in a child and adolescent psychiatry clinic of a regional pediatric medical center who completed at least one of the target depression measures. We examined the factor structure and internal reliability for the PHQ-9A, and calculated RCIs for patients with a depression-related diagnosis for both measures.

resultsAnalyses confirmed a one-factor solution and adequate internal consistency (α = .86) for the PHQ-9A. All measures yielded acceptable test-retest reliabilities (r > 0.75) and RCIs that equate to clinical practice recommendations of using reliable changes scores of 7, 6, and 8 for the PHQ-9A, the SMFQ-Child Report, and the SMFQ-Parent Report, respectively.

conclusionPsychometric validation of the PHQ-9A and these RCIs are timely and significant contributions to the treatment of youth depression, by facilitating effective use of MBC-a critical evidence-based strategy for improving treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomechild and adolescent depressionmeasurement-based care (MBC)PHQ-9Areliable change index (RCI)SMFQ

Identifiers

PMID30825497
PMCPMC11488664
OpenAlexW2917192082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.