ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2019
Is Treatment Working? Detecting Real Change in the Treatment of Child and Adolescent Depression.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening for depression in children and adolescents in primary care or non-mental health settings: a systematic review update.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Beyond Jacobson and Truax: Estimation of Clinical Significance Trajectories in the Coping Power Intervention Using Measurement Error-Corrected Multilevel Modeling.Behavior therapy · 2025Trial
- Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Older Adolescent with Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Study of Clinical and Functional Connectivity.Research square · 2025Article
- Association of Problematic Internet Use With Psychotic Experiences and Depression in Adolescents: A Cohort Study.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- Treatment and Outcomes Among North Carolina Medicaid-Insured Youth With Depression.JAACAP open · 2023Article
- Abnormal volumetric brain morphometry and cerebral blood flow in adolescents with depression.World journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Adolescent Version (QIDS-ANeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Article
- Measurement-based care for suicidal youth: Outcomes and recommendations from the Services for Teens At Risk (STAR) Center.PloS one · 2023Article
- Protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of a vitamin-mineral formula targeting dysregulated emotions in teenagers: The balancing emotions of adolescents with micronutrients (BEAM) study.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Clinical utility of family history of depression for prognosis of adolescent depression severity and duration assessed with predictive modeling.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022Article
- Determining minimal important change for the thyroid-related quality of life questionnaire ThyPRO.Endocrine connections · 2021Article
- ADHD Medication and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite advances in evidence-based treatments for youth depression in recent decades, overall treatment effects are modest at best, with 30% to 50% of youth being nonresponders. Practice parameters consistently recommend systematic assessment and routine monitoring of depressive symptoms, or measurement-based care (MBC), to enhance youth depression treatment. However, the literature offers few guidelines on how to use assessment results to inform care decisions or to detect real and clinically meaningful change. Thus the current study produced reliable change indices (RCIs) per Jacobson and Truax for two commonly used standardized assessments of youth depression (ie, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items, Modified for Adolescents [PHQ-9A], the Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire [SMFQ]).
methodThe study sample (N = 1,738) consisted of youths 6 to 18 years old seen in a child and adolescent psychiatry clinic of a regional pediatric medical center who completed at least one of the target depression measures. We examined the factor structure and internal reliability for the PHQ-9A, and calculated RCIs for patients with a depression-related diagnosis for both measures.
resultsAnalyses confirmed a one-factor solution and adequate internal consistency (α = .86) for the PHQ-9A. All measures yielded acceptable test-retest reliabilities (r > 0.75) and RCIs that equate to clinical practice recommendations of using reliable changes scores of 7, 6, and 8 for the PHQ-9A, the SMFQ-Child Report, and the SMFQ-Parent Report, respectively.
conclusionPsychometric validation of the PHQ-9A and these RCIs are timely and significant contributions to the treatment of youth depression, by facilitating effective use of MBC-a critical evidence-based strategy for improving treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.