ArticleJAMA dermatology2019
Use of Antibiotics for Dermatologic Procedures From 2008 to 2016.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Antibiotic Adherence Practices in Dermatologic Surgery: a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
Perspectives on Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Dermatologic Surgery: a Prospective Multi-center Cohort Study
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current and Future Perspectives in Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Preventing Surgical Site Infections in the Era of Escalating Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic Stewardship.JAMA surgery · 2024Review
- Comment on "Antibiotic Resistance in Dermatology: The Scope of the Problem and Strategies to Address It".Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2022Article
- Inappropriate Topical Antibiotics Use in Clean Dermatological Procedures in South Korea in 2018: A Nationwide Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Korean journal of family medicine · 2022Article
- Postoperative surgical site infection rate in patients with diabetes following Mohs micrographic surgery: a retrospective analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022Article
- The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on infection rates in mohs micrographic surgery: a single-institution retrospective study.Archives of dermatological research · 2021Article
- Antibiotic utilization in Medicare beneficiaries receiving Mohs micrographic surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2020Article
- Postoperative Infections in Dermatologic Surgery: The Role of Wound Cultures.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2020Article
- Letter to the Editor Title Correction Made in Error.JAMA dermatology · 2020Article
- [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatosurgery-2019 status quo].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Although overall antibiotic use among dermatologists is decreasing, there has been an increase in use associated with dermatologic procedures during the past decade. This higher antibiotic use may increase antibiotic-associated adverse events and promote the development of antibiotic resistance. Objective: To characterize antibiotic use associated with dermatologic procedures, including geographic variation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using Optum Clinformatics DataMart deidentified commercial claims data, we performed a repeated cross-sectional analysis of antibiotic prescribing by dermatologists from 2008 to 2016. Dermatology clinicians were identified by their National Uniform Claim Committee taxonomy codes, encounters for surgical procedures were identified by Common Procedure Terminology codes, and courses of oral antibiotics prescribed by these clinicians were identified by their National Drug Codes. Exposures: Claims for oral antibiotic prescriptions associated with encounters with dermatologists associated with dermatologic procedures. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequency of antibiotic prescribing and associated procedures. Poisson regression models were used to assess for changes in the frequency of antibiotic prescribing over time. Results: Between 2008 and 2016, among 1 934 633 encounters (1 128 244 unique patients, 854 072 [44.1%] were women and the median [interquartile range] age was 66 [52-76] years) for dermatologic procedures, oral antibiotic prescribing associated with benign excisions increased from 2.9% to 4.4% of visits (52.5% relative change; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.04), antibiotic prescribing associated with malignant excisions increased from 4.2% to 6.3% of visits (49.5% relative change; IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.06), and antibiotic prescribing associated with Mohs surgery increased from 9.9% to 13.8% of visits (39.7% relative change; IRR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.04). There was greater than 2-fold variation in antibiotic prescribing rates across geographic census divisions. If higher prescribing divisions were to develop antibiotic prescribing rates similar to lower prescribing divisions, antibiotic use could be decreased by over 50%. Conclusions and Relevance: Oral antibiotic prescribing by dermatologists associated with benign excisions, malignant excisions, and Mohs surgery is increasing over the past decade and there is substantial geographic variation. These findings highlight that there may be opportunities to optimize antibiotic use associated with dermatologic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.