ArticleCancer2019
A scale to assess religious beliefs in end-of-life medical care.
Article in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Giving Information Systematically and Transparently in Lung and GI Cancer
Giving Information Systematically and Transparently in Lung and GI Cancer Phase 2
A Clinical Trial of Interventions to Support Family Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coping in caregivers of patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- A Multidimensional Narrative Review of Disparities in Hospice Care Use.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026Article
- Illness understanding and religiousness in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- Christianity.Cancer treatment and research · 2023Article
- Assessing Religious Commitment in a Multicultural Inpatient Setting: A Psychometric Evaluation of the 10-item Belief into Action Scale.Journal of religion and health · 2021Article
- Article
- Patient Spirituality as a Component of Supportive Care: Assessment and Intervention.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers' Religious and Spiritual Beliefs With End-of-Life Decisions.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies postulate that certain religious beliefs related to medical care influence the end-of-life (EOL) medical decision making and care of patients with advanced cancer. Because to the best of the authors' knowledge no current measure explicitly assesses such beliefs, in the current study the authors introduced and evaluated the Religious Beliefs in EOL Medical Care (RBEC) scale, a new measure designed to assess religious beliefs within the context of EOL cancer care.
methodsThe RBEC scale consists of 7 items designed to reflect religious beliefs in EOL medical care. Its psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of 275 patients with advanced cancer from the Coping With Cancer II study, a National Cancer Institute-funded, multisite, longitudinal, observational study of communication processes and outcomes in EOL cancer care.
resultsThe RBEC scale proved to be internally consistent (Cronbach α, .81), unidimensional, positively associated with other indicators of patients' religiousness and spirituality (establishing its convergent validity), and inversely associated with patients' terminal illness understanding and acceptance (establishing its criterion validity), suggesting its potential clinical usefulness in promoting informed EOL decision making. The majority of patients (87%) reported some ("somewhat," "quite a bit," or "a great deal") endorsement of at least 1 RBEC item and a majority (62%) endorsed ≥3 RBEC items.
conclusionsThe RBEC scale is a reliable and valid tool with which to assess religious beliefs within the context of EOL medical care, beliefs that frequently are endorsed and inversely associated with terminal illness understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.