ArticleSystematic biology2019
Automated Taxonomic Identification of Insects with Expert-Level Accuracy Using Effective Feature Transfer from Convolutional Networks.
Article in Systematic biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning reveals ecological decoupling and rate heterogeneity in Hymenoptera wing evolution.Science advances · 2026Article
- Species identification, discovery, and biomonitoring: Strategic priorities for DNA barcoding in Europe, set in a global context.Bioscience · 2026Article
- Machine learning workflows detect ground-dwelling arthropods against heterogenous backgrounds.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
- Multi-angle, cross-domain fusion strategy enhances automated insect identification and hierarchical categorization: a case study on assassin bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae).Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2026Article
- Accurate Identification of Key Groups of Microeukaryotes Using Multimodal Deep Learning: An Integrated Classification Model Combining Morphological and Molecular Data.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Unraveling hidden species diversity of talpid moles using phylogenomics and skull-based deep learning.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Integrating Genomics, Collections, and Community Science to Delimit Species Clarifies the Taxonomy of a Variable Monitor Lizard (Varanus tristis).Systematic biology · 2026Article
- Multi-View Pareto Optimization for Minimal-Diagnostic-Set Identification of Disease Vectors.Insects · 2026Article
- HISNET-FF: Hierarchical identification of species using a network with fused cranial and dental features.Zoological research · 2026Article
- Analysis of Biological Images and Quantitative Monitoring Using Deep Learning and Computer Vision.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Evaluation of BugBox, a software platform for AI-assisted bioinventories of arthropods.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Numerical Signature Dataset of Curculionidae and Tenebrionidae Beetle Fragments for ML Identification.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Expanding phenological insights: automated phenostage annotation with community science plant images.International journal of biometeorology · 2025Article
- Integrating Deep Learning Derived Morphological Traits and Molecular Data for Total-Evidence Phylogenetics: Lessons from Digitized Collections.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Utilizing CNNs for classification and uncertainty quantification for 15 families of European fly pollinators.PloS one · 2025Article
- AMS-YOLO: multi-scale feature integration for intelligent plant protection against maize pests.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Crossing multiple life stages: fine-grained classification of agricultural pests.Plant methods · 2024Article
- AI-driven convolutional neural networks for accurate identification of yellow fever vectors.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Towards holistic insect monitoring: species discovery, description, identification and traits for all insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and reliable identification of insects is important in many contexts, from the detection of disease vectors and invasive species to the sorting of material from biodiversity inventories. Because of the shortage of adequate expertise, there has long been an interest in developing automated systems for this task. Previous attempts have been based on laborious and complex handcrafted extraction of image features, but in recent years it has been shown that sophisticated convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can learn to extract relevant features automatically, without human intervention. Unfortunately, reaching expert-level accuracy in CNN identifications requires substantial computational power and huge training data sets, which are often not available for taxonomic tasks. This can be addressed using feature transfer: a CNN that has been pretrained on a generic image classification task is exposed to the taxonomic images of interest, and information about its perception of those images is used in training a simpler, dedicated identification system. Here, we develop an effective method of CNN feature transfer, which achieves expert-level accuracy in taxonomic identification of insects with training sets of 100 images or less per category, depending on the nature of data set. Specifically, we extract rich representations of intermediate to high-level image features from the CNN architecture VGG16 pretrained on the ImageNet data set. This information is submitted to a linear support vector machine classifier, which is trained on the target problem. We tested the performance of our approach on two types of challenging taxonomic tasks: 1) identifying insects to higher groups when they are likely to belong to subgroups that have not been seen previously and 2) identifying visually similar species that are difficult to separate even for experts. For the first task, our approach reached $CDATA[$CDATA[$>$$92% accuracy on one data set (884 face images of 11 families of Diptera, all specimens representing unique species), and $CDATA[$CDATA[$>$$96% accuracy on another (2936 dorsal habitus images of 14 families of Coleoptera, over 90% of specimens belonging to unique species). For the second task, our approach outperformed a leading taxonomic expert on one data set (339 images of three species of the Coleoptera genus Oxythyrea; 97% accuracy), and both humans and traditional automated identification systems on another data set (3845 images of nine species of Plecoptera larvae; 98.6 % accuracy). Reanalyzing several biological image identification tasks studied in the recent literature, we show that our approach is broadly applicable and provides significant improvements over previous methods, whether based on dedicated CNNs, CNN feature transfer, or more traditional techniques. Thus, our method, which is easy to apply, can be highly successful in developing automated taxonomic identification systems even when training data sets are small and computational budgets limited. We conclude by briefly discussing some promising CNN-based research directions in morphological systematics opened up by the success of these techniques in providing accurate diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.