Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825304›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

The Draft Genome of an Octocoral, Dendronephthya gigantea.

Yeonsu Jeon, Seung Gu Park, Nayun Lee, Jessica A Weber, Hui-Su Kim, Sung-Jin Hwang, Seonock Woo, Hak-Min Kim, Youngjune Bhak, Sungwon Jeon and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phylogeography of Cold Water Soft CoralEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The genome of the colonial hydroidGenome research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The coralScience advances · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yeonsu JeonKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Seung Gu ParkKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Nayun LeeEcological Risk Research Division, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Geoje, Republic of Korea.
Jessica A WeberDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hui-Su KimKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Jin HwangDepartment of Life Science, Woosuk University, Republic of Korea.
Seonock WooMarine Biotechnology Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hak-Min KimKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Youngjune BhakKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Sungwon JeonKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Nayoung LeeEcological Risk Research Division, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Geoje, Republic of Korea.
Yejin JoEcological Risk Research Division, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Geoje, Republic of Korea.
Asta BlazyteKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Taewoo RyuAPEC Climate Center, Busan, South Korea.
Yun Sung ChoKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Hyunho KimPersonal Genomics Institute, Genome Research Foundation, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hyun LeeMarine Biotechnology Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Soon YimMarine Biotechnology Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jong BhakKorean Genomics Industrialization and Commercialization Center (KOGIC), Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Seungshic YumEcological Risk Research Division, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Geoje, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs composed of stony corals are threatened by global marine environmental changes. However, soft coral communities of octocorallian species, appear more resilient. The genomes of several cnidarians species have been published, including from stony corals, sea anemones, and hydra. To fill the phylogenetic gap for octocoral species of cnidarians, we sequenced the octocoral, Dendronephthya gigantea, a nonsymbiotic soft coral, commonly known as the carnation coral. The D. gigantea genome size is ∼276 Mb. A high-quality genome assembly was constructed from PacBio long reads (29.85 Gb with 108× coverage) and Illumina short paired-end reads (35.54 Gb with 128× coverage) resulting in the highest N50 value (1.4 Mb) reported thus far among cnidarian genomes. About 12% of the genome is repetitive elements and contained 28,879 predicted protein-coding genes. This gene set is composed of 94% complete BUSCO ortholog benchmark genes, which is the second highest value among the cnidarians, indicating high quality. Based on molecular phylogenetic analysis, octocoral and hexacoral divergence times were estimated at 544 MYA. There is a clear difference in Hox gene composition between these species: unlike hexacorals, the Antp superclass Evx gene was absent in D. gigantea. Here, we present the first genome assembly of a nonsymbiotic octocoral, D. gigantea to aid in the comparative genomic analysis of cnidarians, including stony and soft corals, both symbiotic and nonsymbiotic. The D. gigantea genome may also provide clues to mechanisms of differential coping between the soft and stony corals in response to scenarios of global warming.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthozoaGenomePhylogenycnidarianDendronephthya giganteagenomenonsymbiotic coraloctocoralsoft coral

Identifiers

PMID30825304
PMCPMC6447388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.