Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825258›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2019

Adherence to medication in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: An investigation using objective adherence data and the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Madelynne A Arden, Sarah Drabble, Alicia O'Cathain, Marlene Hutchings, Martin Wildman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Medication adherence in youths with CKD: habits for success.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patients' experiences of behaviour change interventions delivered by general practitioners during routine consultations: A nationally representative survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Madelynne A ArdenCentre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology (CeBSAP), Sheffield Hallam University, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6199-717X
Sarah DrabbleSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK.
Alicia O'CathainSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK.
Marlene HutchingsSheffield Adult CF Centre, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Martin WildmanSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1212-20015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdherence to nebulizer treatment in adults with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is poor, and interventions are needed. This research aimed to identify the factors affecting nebulizer adherence using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and to compare these for participants with different levels of adherence.

designData-prompted interviews using the TDF.

methodsEighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with CF during which objectively measured adherence data were discussed. Framework analysis was used to code the data into TDF domains, and inductive qualitative content analysis was used to code different beliefs and experiences. Aspects of the TDF that differed between participants with different adherence levels were explored.

resultsFactors influencing adherence to treatment included all 14 domains of the TDF, 10 of which appeared to vary by adherence level: Skills; Memory and decision-making; and Behavioural regulation; Environmental context and resources; Social influences; Beliefs about consequences; Beliefs about capability; Reinforcement; Social role and identify; Intentions; Optimism; and Emotions.

conclusionsThis study is the first to use objectively measured adherence data in a data-prompted interview using the TDF framework to systematically assess the full range of factors potentially influencing adherence. The results highlighted that interventions need to consider issues of capability, opportunity, and motivation. Interventions that challenge dysfunctional beliefs about adherence and which support the development of routines or habits and problem-solving may be particularly useful for adults with CF. Statement of contribution What is already known? Adherence to medication in adults with cystic fibrosis is poor. Previous research has identified a range of contributing factors in relation to subjective reports of adherence. There is a wide discrepancy between self-reported adherence and objectively measured adherence. What this study adds A data-prompted interview using objectively measured adherence data enabled the systematic assessment of potential factors that could be targeted in an intervention to increase adherence. There were some differences in the factors that were identified by high and low adherers. There is not one-size fits all intervention for adherence to medication in cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdolescentAdultCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleUnited KingdomYoung AdultAdherence to medicationCystic Fibrosisdata-prompted interviewInterventionObjective adherenceTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

PMID30825258
PMCPMC6519271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.