Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825214›Full record

ReviewScandinavian journal of immunology2019

The history of the two-signal model of lymphocyte activation: A personal perspective.

Peter A Bretscher

Open access · hybridAbstract readAutobiographyHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scandinavian journal of immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Defending and integrating an organism by the immune system.Scandinavian journal of immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. PLGA Nanospheres as Delivery Platforms forFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  10. Nano vaccines forFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Long-term impacts of tonsillectomy on children's immune functions.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter A BretscherDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-9846
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant RGPIN 2018-14111`7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first ideas leading to The Two-Signal Model of lymphocyte activation were published 50 years ago, but the model was not realized in one sitting. I describe the three phases that led to its contemporary formulations. A motivation underlying all these models was to generate a minimal description of what is required for antigen to inactivate and activate mature lymphocytes that, at the same time, accounts for how peripheral tolerance is achieved. I suggest the two signal model has not only provided a substantiated framework for understanding how antigen interacts differently with B cells and CD8 T cells, to result in their inactivation and activation, but its postulates are pertinent to contemporary issues concerning the inactivation and activation of CD4 T cells.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHistory, 20th CenturyLymphocyte ActivationSelf ToleranceSignal Transductionautoimmunitycell activationcellscostimulationprocessesT cellstolerance/suppression/anergy

Identifiers

PMID30825214
PMCPMC6850391
OpenAlexW2919350624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.