ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2019
Determinants of Initial Antibiotic Duration in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practice variations and rates of late onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in very preterm born infants, a review.Translational pediatrics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVery low birth weight (VLBW) neonates (< 1500 g) are commonly exposed to prolonged antibiotic courses related to concerns for presumed early onset sepsis often with unclear indications. While antibiotics can be life-saving medications, prolonged antibiotic exposure (> 5 days) increases an infant's risk for necrotizing enterocolitis, late onset sepsis, colonization or infection with resistant organisms, and death. The aim of this study is to describe clinical and laboratory factors that influence the length of initial antibiotic courses in VLBW neonates.
methodsDemographics, perinatal factors, and neonatal clinical and laboratory data were compared in a single-center retrospective cohort of VLBW neonates who received ≤ 3 days versus > 5 days of initial antibiotics.
resultsA total of 121 patients were analyzed of which 117 (97%) were started on antibiotics empirically on admission, and 71 (59%) received ≤ 3 days and 50 (41%) received > 5 days of antibiotics. One (0.8%) infant had a positive blood culture (S. oralis). Demographics [gestational age (p < 0.001) and birth weight (p < 0.001)] and neonatal clinical status [Apgar score at 5 min (p = 0.001), CRIB II (p < 0.001), need for inotropes (p = 0.001), and maximum ventilator support (p < 0.001)] were significantly different between the short and prolonged course of antibiotics groups on bivariate analysis. There were no significant differences in perinatal factors or common laboratory markers of sepsis. Maximum ventilator support remained significant on multivariate analysis (p = 0.007).
conclusionIn the VLBW population, the clinical status of the neonate, as represented by maximum ventilator support in this study, was the most important factor in determining the duration of initial antibiotic treatment. Laboratory values and perinatal risk factors did not significantly influence prescribing patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.