Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825097›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2019

A Community-Partnered, Evidence-Based Approach to Improving Cancer Care Delivery for Low-Income and Minority Patients with Cancer.

Manali Patel, Nevedal Andrea, Bhattacharya Jay, Tumaini R Coker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  11. Assessing the Acceptability of a Co-Produced Long COVID Intervention in an Underserved Community in the UK.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manali PatelDivision of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA. manalip@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-5762
Nevedal AndreaMedical Services, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Bhattacharya JayCenter for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tumaini R CokerSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Reducing Disparities in End of Life Cancer CareK23MD013474 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PATEL, MANALI I · 2018 to 2020
$502k
NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD013474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-engaged adaptations of evidence-based interventions are needed to improve cancer care delivery for low-income and minority populations with cancer. The objective of this study was to adapt an intervention to improve end-of-life cancer care delivery using a community-partnered approach. We used a two-step formative research process to adapt the evidence-based lay health workers educate engage and encourage patients to share (LEAPS) cancer care intervention. The first step involved obtaining a series of adaptations through focus groups with 15 patients, 12 caregivers, and 6 leaders and staff of the Unite Here Health (UHH) payer organization, and 12 primary care and oncology care providers. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. The second step involved finalization of adaptations from a community advisory board comprised of 4 patients, 2 caregivers, 4 oncology providers, 2 lay health workers and 4 UHH healthcare payer staff and executive leaders. Using this community-engaged approach, stakeholders identified critical barriers and solutions to intervention delivery which included: (1) expanding the intervention to ensure patient recruitment; (2) including caregivers; (3) regular communication between UHH staff, primary care and oncology providers; and (4) selecting outcomes that reflect patient-reported quality of life. This systematic and community-partnered approach to adapt an end-of-life cancer care intervention strengthened this existing intervention to promote the needs and preferences of patients, caregivers, providers, and healthcare payer leaders. This approach can be used to address cancer care delivery for low-income and minority patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesMinority GroupsDelivery of Health CareHumansNeoplasmsPovertyTerminal CareCancer care deliveryCommunity careCommunity-engaged adaptationEnd-of-lifeLow-income and minority populations

Identifiers

PMID30825097
PMCPMC7046315
OpenAlexW2919578130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.