Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825022›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2019

Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic Enterococcus faecium on growth performance and gut microbiota in weaned piglets.

Chengjun Hu, Weigang Xing, Xiaohua Liu, Xiuzhu Zhang, Ke Li, Jia Liu, Baichuan Deng, Jinping Deng, Yong Li, Chengquan Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Modulation of microbial community and metabolism throughJournal of animal science and technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Mink-OriginAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. Effects of dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gut microbial shifts by synbiotic combination ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chengjun HuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Weigang XingNewhope Liuhe Corp. Ltd, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohua LiuNewhope Liuhe Corp. Ltd, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Xiuzhu ZhangNewhope Liuhe Corp. Ltd, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Ke LiNewhope Liuhe Corp. Ltd, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Jia LiuNewhope Liuhe Corp. Ltd, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China.
Baichuan DengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Jinping DengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Yong LiNewhope Liuhe Corp. Ltd, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China. liyong2@newhope.cn.
Chengquan TanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, Institute of Subtropical Animal Nutrition and Feed, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510640, China. tanchengquan@scau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-1807
New Hope Liuhe (China) · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31790411Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (CN) 2017A030310398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adverse effects of antibiotics have attracted widespread attention, thus reducing the use of antibiotics in animal feed has become a very important issue in improving of the health of livestock. The effects of Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) on growth performance and gut microbiota in weaned piglets were investigated in the present study. Piglets were randomly assigned to four treatments: a control group fed with a diet containing 75 mg/kg aureomycin (Diet 1 group) and three experimental groups fed with diets of 50 mg/kg aureomycin (Diet 2 group), 50 mg/kg aureomycin + 9 × 10

Indexed as

16SrRNA geneAntibioticsEnterococcus faeciumGrowth performanceMicrobiotaWeaned piglets

Identifiers

PMID30825022
PMCPMC6397275
OpenAlexW2942398567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.