Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30825007›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

Diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound imaging in differentiating benign and malignant TI-RADS category 4 nodules.

Shufang Pei, Shuzhen Cong, Bin Zhang, Changhong Liang, Lu Zhang, Juanjuan Liu, Yuping Guo, Shuixing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ultrasound microflow patterns help in distinguishing malignant from benign thyroid nodules.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shufang PeiThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Shuzhen CongThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Changhong LiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong General Hospital, No. 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong General Hospital, No. 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Juanjuan LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yuping GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Shuixing ZhangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. shui7515@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid imaging reporting and data system category 4 (TI-RADS-4) nodules can be difficult using conventional ultrasound (US). This study aimed to evaluate whether multimodal ultrasound imaging can improve differentiation and characterization of benign and malignant TI-RADS-4 nodules.

methodsMultimodal ultrasound imaging, including US, superb microvascular imaging (SMI), and real-time elastography (RTE), were performed on 196 TI-RADS-4 nodules (78, benign; 118, malignant) in 170 consecutive patients. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false negative rate (FNR), and false positive rate (FPR) of each single method and that of multimodal US imaging were determined by comparison with surgical pathology results.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, FNR, and FPR for US were 65.25%, 69.23%, 66.84%, 34.75%, 30.77%, respectively; for SMI were 77.97%, 93.59%, 84.18%, 22.03%, 6.41%, respectively; RTE, 80.51%, 84.62%, 82.14%, 19.49%, 15.38%; and for multimodal US imaging were 94.08%, 87.18%, 91.33%, 6.93%, 12.82%, respectively. The areas under the received operating characteristic curve for US, SMI, RTE, and multimodal US imaging in evaluating benign and malignant TI-RADS-4 nodules were 67.2%, 84.40%, 86.60%, and 95.50%, respectively.

conclusionsThe initial clinical results suggest that multimodal US imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of TI-RADS-4 nodules and provides additional information for differentiating malignant and benign nodules.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansMultimodal ImagingResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesROC CurveThyroid GlandThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleUltrasonographyMultimodal ultrasound ImagingReal-time elastographySuperb microvascular imagingThyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID30825007
PMCPMC6525125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.